Bug#831841: RFS: stterm/0.6-1~bpo8+1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stterm" * Package name: stterm Version : 0.6-1~bpo8+1 Upstream Author : Christoph Lohmann (irc __20h__) <2...@r-36.net> * Url : http://st.suckless.org *

Bug#831829: RFS: self-destructing-cookies/0.4.10-1 [ITP] -- delete cookies and LocalStorage after tabs using them have been closed

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package self-destructing-cookies. With this addon installed, Firefox will delete cookies and LocalStorage when there are no longer any open tabs using those cookies or LocalStorage entries. Sites

Bug#831818: marked as done (RFS: pickleshare/0.7.3-1)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2016 22:14:58 + (UTC) with message-id <1799085126.3098030.1468966498302.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#831818: RFS: pickleshare/0.7.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831818, regarding RFS: pickleshare/0.7.3-1 to be marked as done.

Bug#831818: RFS: pickleshare/0.7.3-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pickleshare" * Package name: pickleshare Version : 0.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Ville Vainio * URL : https://github.com/pickleshare/pickleshare * License

Bug#831811: marked as done (RFS: pynac/0.6.8-1)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:10:58 + (UTC) with message-id <1771498619.2945705.1468951858870.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#831811: RFS: pynac/0.6.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831811, regarding RFS: pynac/0.6.8-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#831811: RFS: pynac/0.6.8-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pynac" * Package name: pynac Version : 0.6.8-1 Upstream Author : Burcin Erocal * URL : http://pynac.org * License : GPL-2+ Section :

Bug#831763: marked as done (RFS: cdist/4.2.1-1 )

Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:59:58 + (UTC) with message-id <1744864898.2837630.1468943998980.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#831763: RFS: cdist/4.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #831763, regarding RFS: cdist/4.2.1-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#831763: RFS: cdist/4.2.1-1

> E404 Sorry. Forgot. Fixed. > missing copyrights: > e.g. > # 2016 Darko Poljak (darko.poljak at gmail.com) > # 2015-2016 Steven Armstrong (steven-cdist at armstrong.cc) Fixed. > some licenses seems to be GPL-3 only :( > +Copyright \(C) 2012,2016 Jake Guffey. Free use of this software is >

Bug#831792: RFS: scid/1:4.6.2-0.1 [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scid": * Package name: scid Version : 4.6.2-0.1 Upstream Author : Fulvio Benini * URL : http://scid.sf.net * License : GPL v2

Re: reproducible-builds

Em Ter, 2016-07-19 às 12:42 +, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:38:44AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > I do not have a special interest in the package. Just > > a QA to do. I also did a repository (collab-maint) for > > it. > > You could/shoud have set Vcs-* in

Re: reproducible-builds

Hi, > Something failed somewhere in the second build, not in the package build > itself but rather in the building script and was not properly detected > as an infrastructure error (but rather as a FTBFS). > I triggered another build of the package and not it has built > successfully. Thanks for

Re: reproducible-builds

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:38:44AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > I do not have a special interest in the package. Just > a QA to do. I also did a repository (collab-maint) for > it. You could/shoud have set Vcs-* in d/control for that. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG

Re: reproducible-builds

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote: > Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups There are apparently at least two computers that run it regularly: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dvbackup Also, I assume Herbert has some reason for working on it. --

Re: reproducible-builds

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:51PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that > > > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The > > > build was

Re: reproducible-builds

Am 2016-07-19 11:29, schrieb Dominique Dumont: On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote: dvbackup Is this package worth the effort ? Not a user myself, but the package is already in the archive (it's not an ITP), and I think reproducibility for _all_ of Debian is a goal

Re: reproducible-builds

* Dominique Dumont , 2016-07-19, 11:29: dvbackup Is this package worth the effort ? Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups when a 16GB thumb drive has more capacity and is more practical for this purpose than a DV camcorder ? I certainly wouldn't

Re: reproducible-builds

On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote: > dvbackup Is this package worth the effort ? Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups when a 16GB thumb drive has more capacity and is more practical for this purpose than a DV camcorder ? All the best --

Bug#831763: RFS: cdist/4.2.1-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist" here we are >http://mentors.debian.net/package/cdist E404 missing copyrights: e.g. # 2016 Darko Poljak (darko.poljak at gmail.com) # 2015-2016 Steven Armstrong (steven-cdist at

Re: uscan for a single text file

>>Seriously, though. I've also had to do a few modifications to the Hi, >Sorry, forgot to change the error message. The correct is 2. committed and pushed :) thanks! G.

Bug#831763: RFS: cdist/4.2.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist" * Package name: cdist Version : 4.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius * Url :

Re: Please help upgrading eigensoft

Hi, El Dimarts, 19 de juliol de 2016, a les 09:27:10, Christian Seiler va escriure: [] > > DSPEV etc. are LAPACK routines, but you only link against BLAS. [1] > You also need to link against LAPACK for this to work. Add -llapack > before -lblas in your Makefile and it should work. > >

Bug#830417: RFS: django-setuptest/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

I have now checked the package into the python-modules Alioth repository: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/django-setuptest.git/ Thank you. Christopher

Re: Please help upgrading eigensoft

On 07/18/2016 10:21 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > ... > cc -Wl,-z,relro pca.o eigensrc/eigsubs.o eigx.o nicksrc/libnick.a -lgsl > -lblas -lgfortran -lrt -lm -o pca > eigx.o: In function `eigx_': > /build/eigensoft-6.1.2+dfsg/src/eigx.c:100: undefined reference to `dspev_' > eigx.o: In function

Re: uscan for a single text file

Sergio Durigan Junior writes: > On Sunday, July 17 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: >> If mk-origtargz doesn't repack it, why does it look into it? The symlink >> could be created without as well. > > It makes sure that there is a tarball compressed using the supported >