Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shark"
* Package name: shark
Version : 3.1.1+ds1-1
Upstream Author : Christian Igel
* URL : http://image.diku.dk/shark/
* License : LGPL-3
Section
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:39:33PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > If the repository contains any tags, I'd strongly recommend the output of
> > > "git describe --tags". This will, beside DTRT when you're exactly on a
> > > tag (ie, on a release), produce version numbers of the form:
> > > -<# o
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> * dh-text
I wonder if a mechanism for this should go directly into debhelper itself?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gxmessage"
* Package name: gxmessage
* Version : 3.4.3-1
* Upstream Author : Tim Musson
* URL : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gxmessage/
* License
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 08:43:05AM +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
> > For example, support I'm packaging 0~git.abc123d. This version number
> > might be used because I'm basing my packaging on upstream git commit
> > whose hash is uniquely identified by the string 'abc123d'
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:04:43PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 05:00:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > If the repository contains any tags, I'd strongly recommend the output of
> > "git describe --tags". This will, beside DTRT when you're exactly on a
> > tag (ie,
Thank you for the review. I will prepare a new release 2.9 removing the
copyrighted files (MIBs and MIB products) as it is done in the 2.8+dfsg
. It is not important they are part of the project code anyway. Seems we
are almost there.
On 08/16/2016 08:00 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 8 août
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zuki-themes"
* Package name: zuki-themes
* Version : 3.20-1-1
* Upstream Author : Mattias
* URL : https://github.com/lassekongo83/zuki-themes
* License : GPL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU to the package "telepathy-ring"
* Package name: telepathy-ring
Version : 2.1.0-1.1
Upstream Author : Freedesktop.org
* URL : https://cgit.freedesktop.org/telepathy/tele
❦ 8 août 2016 03:00 CEST, Vladimir Vassilev :
>> - d/watch: missing, please add one. It allows you (or me) to
>> conveniently know if there is a new version available. This appears
>> on various tools like tracker.debian.org or qa.debian.org.
> [1] fixed
There is a slight error in it
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 05:00:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> If the repository contains any tags, I'd strongly recommend the output of
> "git describe --tags". This will, beside DTRT when you're exactly on a
> tag (ie, on a release), produce version numbers of the form:
> -<# of commits>-g, wh
the hash?
> >
> > Generally speaking, is there a recommended Debian version format for
> > git snapshots?
> 1.1+20160816, or ~ instead of +, as usual.
> Unless you are packaging two different snapshots committed at the same
> day.
If the repository contains any tags, I'
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:57:47 +
with message-id <20160816125745.67nvuy2v4n7ud...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#822634: RFS: magit-svn/2.1.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #822634,
regarding RFS: magit-svn/2.1.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means tha
control: tags -1 moreinf
Hi,
>* Initial release (Closes: #739035)
lets try a review:
1) std-version is 3.9.8 now
2) debhelper (>= 9), libncurses5-dev (>= 5.9),
unzip (>= 6.0), libsdl2-dev (>= 2.0.2), libsdl1.2-dev (>= 1.2.15),
gcc (>= 4:4.9)
do you really need both sdl1.2 and sdl2?
do y
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:17:48 + (UTC)
with message-id
<1496426134.25055327.1471346268909.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825302: RFS: usbguard/0.4-2 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #825302,
regarding RFS: usbguard/0.5.11-1 [ITP]
to be marked as don
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:21:13 + (UTC)
with message-id <83278355.24938116.1471342873729.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#827582: RFS: lua-torch-xlua/0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #827582,
regarding RFS: lua-torch-xlua/0~2016061
> I'd be more than happy to replace the custom recipes in my rules files
> with your dh-text solution, it seems very neat. Just let me point out a
> copy&paste mistake in the head of dh-text:
>
> # dh_text --- debhelper to create system users
>
> Please give it its own synopsis.
Nice catch. Fixe
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phatch"
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * debian/patches:
> + Add fix-loading.patch to fix load with latest version of
>python-imaging
>and python-pil. (Closes: #811184, LP: #1567827)
this looks good t
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:07:12 + (UTC)
with message-id
<1609059385.25071994.1471342032342.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#834325: RFS: lua-torch-graph/0~20160415-g34d7128-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #834325,
regarding RFS: lua-torch-graph/0~2
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:23:35 + (UTC)
with message-id
<1772874509.24995288.1471339415741.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#834332: RFS: lua-torch-optim/0~20160808-g6c59c35-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #834332,
regarding RFS: lua-torch-optim/0~2
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:09:48AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > > Generally speaking, is there a recommended Debian version format for
> > > git snapshots?
> > 1.1+20160816, or ~ instead of +, as usual.
> > Unless you are packaging two different snapshots
ied by the string 'abc123d'.
Such version numbers won't order correctly. Didn't you mean to include
a monotonically increasing component before the hash?
Generally speaking, is there a recommended Debian version format for
git snapshots?
1.1+20160816, or ~ instead of +, as u
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:50:59 + (UTC)
with message-id
<1054726257.25079936.1471337459672.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#834433: RFS: id3/1.0.0-1 [ITA] (adopt, adopt upstream,
fix bugs, refresh packaging)
has caused the Debian Bug report #834433,
regardi
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:30:06 + (UTC)
with message-id <271185032.24974994.1471336206766.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#834429: RFS: arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #834429,
regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-4
to be marked as do
24 matches
Mail list logo
