New #packaging IRC channel

2016-09-02 Thread Paul Wise
Hi folks, There have been some folks who aren't satisfied with the level of signal to noise on the #debian-mentors IRC channel, mainly around people joining who are not aiming at creating policy compliant packages for upload to the Debian archive. People looking for help with private packaging, pa

Bug#836417: marked as done (RFS: netsed/1.2-3 [RC] -- Resolve a FTBFS situation.)

2016-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2016 22:10:25 + (UTC) with message-id <983045272.996942.1472854225...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836417: RFS: netsed/1.2-3 [RC] -- Resolve a FTBFS situation. has caused the Debian Bug report #836417, regarding RFS: netsed/1.2-3 [RC] -- Resolve a FTBF

Bug#836417: RFS: netsed/1.2-3 [RC] -- Resolve a FTBFS situation.

2016-09-02 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, in an attempt to resolve an FTBFS blocker I am looking for a sponsor of a new package revision of "netsed": Package name: netsed Version : 1.2-3 Upstream Author : Julien Viard de Galbert URL : http://s

Bug#836403: marked as done (RFS: shark/3.1.3+ds1-1 [RC])

2016-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:03:57 + (UTC) with message-id <845403904.789591.1472832237...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836403: RFS: shark/3.1.3+ds1-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #836403, regarding RFS: shark/3.1.3+ds1-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that

Re: psocksxx/1.1.0-2

2016-09-02 Thread Niels Thykier
Andrey Rahmatullin: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> * Set compatlevel at debian/compat to 10. >> >> Is using compat 10 already officially endorsed/allowed? > The manpage says "This compatibility level is open for beta testing; > changes may occur."

Bug#836403: RFS: shark/3.1.3+ds1-1 [RC]

2016-09-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shark" * Package name: shark Version : 3.1.3+ds1-1 Upstream Author : Christian Igel * URL : http://image.diku.dk/shark/ * License : LGPL-3 Section

Bug#836333: marked as done (RFS: fplll/5.0.2-1)

2016-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:25:41 + (UTC) with message-id <280205907.767087.1472829941...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836333: RFS: fplll/5.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #836333, regarding RFS: fplll/5.0.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, >I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package couchapp some questions before sponsoring or giving you DM 1) INSTALL_REQUIRES = ['restkit==4.2.2', 'watchdog==0.6.0'] why is restkit manually listed in runtime dependencies? 2) Vcs-Git: h

Bug#835253: RFS: steghide/0.5.1-11 [QA]

2016-09-02 Thread Fernando Seiti Furusato
Hello! Could you please take a look now? I reworked the rules file, changed to 3.0 (quilt) so the diff.gz would not be included anymore. I also changed some things in the Makefiles* so the build would work more smoothly. And now it is using autoreconf. The debdiff output is huge because I reverse

Bug#836382: RFS:paflib/0.3.0-1

2016-09-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi (no need to cc me, I'm subscribed to bug reports) > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "paflib". > This is a packaging update : > > paflib (0.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New upstream release missing changes: d/control: one mai

Bug#836387: marked as done (RFS: opengm/2.3.6+20160901-1 [RC])

2016-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:12:51 + (UTC) with message-id <1956568759.730051.1472829172...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836387: RFS: opengm/2.3.6+20160901-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #836387, regarding RFS: opengm/2.3.6+20160901-1 [RC] to be marked as done. Th

Bug#836350: RFS: flycheck/29-1 -- modern on-the-fly syntax checking for Emacs

2016-09-02 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Fred, On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 05:45:56AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > in flycheck-doc, you put this > > +Depends: www-browser, elpa-flycheck (= ${source:Version}) > +Suggests: elpa-flycheck > > > why this dependency to elpa-flycheck ? You seem to be looking at an older version

Bug#836387: RFS: opengm/2.3.6+20160901-1 [RC]

2016-09-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opengm" * Package name: opengm Version : 2.3.6+20160901-1 Upstream Author : The OpenGM developers * URL : http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/opengm2/ * License

Bug#836382: Fwd: RFS:paflib/0.3.0-1

2016-09-02 Thread TFAUCK POP
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, Gianfranco, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "paflib". This is a packaging update : paflib (0.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release -- Thierry Fauck Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:23:02 +0200 Package na

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

2016-09-02 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package couchapp This package contains a new upstream release and other packaging changes couchapp (1.0.2+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. * Removed non-free bytes. * A

Bug#836373: marked as done (RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-4 [RC])

2016-09-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> (can you please check for other hdf breakages in the archive?) The archive rebuilds resulted in some similar bugreports, the outstanding one is mathgl (#835680), I've submitted a patch to the bugreport last Sunday. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE

Bug#836373: marked as done (RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-4 [RC])

2016-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:44:42 + (UTC) with message-id <537086296.412181.1472813082...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836373: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-4 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #836373, regarding RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-4 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#836373: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-4 [RC]

2016-09-02 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ismrmrd" * Package name: ismrmrd Version : 1.3.2-4 Upstream Author : The ISMRMRD developers * URL : http://ismrmrd.github.io/ * License : Expat Sectio

Re: psocksxx/1.1.0-2

2016-09-02 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Am Freitag, den 02.09.2016, 10:57 +0200 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > On 09/02/2016 10:55 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > > > >   * Set compatlevel at debian/compat to 10. > > Is using compat 10 already officially endorsed/allowed? > > I'm not sure whether I remember this correctly. From

Re: psocksxx/1.1.0-2

2016-09-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > * Set compatlevel at debian/compat to 10. > > Is using compat 10 already officially endorsed/allowed? The manpage says "This compatibility level is open for beta testing; changes may occur." -- WBR, wRAR signature

Re: psocksxx/1.1.0-2

2016-09-02 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/02/2016 10:55 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > * Set compatlevel at debian/compat to 10. Is using compat 10 already officially endorsed/allowed? I'm not sure whether I remember this correctly. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `

psocksxx/1.1.0-2

2016-09-02 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Hello Adrian, Hello @all, I have a new version of psocksxx ready for a review.     * debian/control: - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8 (no changes required). - Change VCS-Browser to secure URI.   * debian/watch: - Bump version to 4 (no changes required).   * debian/copyright: - A