Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-js-yaml"
* Package name: node-js-yaml
Version : 3.6.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Dervus Grim
* URL : https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml
* License : Exp
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 09:52:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > It sounds like being related to deb packaging only, though. Unless you want
> > to deal with rpm/portage/etc too.
>
> I wouldn't object to other non-distro packaging being discuss
Your message dated Sun, 04 Sep 2016 04:29:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: dh-runit/1.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #836523,
regarding RFS: dh-runit/1.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I should be clear that what I had in mind was the question of *actually
> regenerating* the files during the build process, not just the question
> of including them in the source package with a promise that the
> regeneration will actually wo
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 09:41:06AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > From the links you've provided, it seems that the Evernote *.thrift
> > files ought to be packaged as a build-dependency which are then used to
> > generate the *.cpp files when the package is build.
> >
> > If it's impossible t
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> It sounds like being related to deb packaging only, though. Unless you want
> to deal with rpm/portage/etc too.
I wouldn't object to other non-distro packaging being discussed there.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> As I understand Policy, Built-Using: should mention any packages, parts
> of which were incorporated into binary package, including any debhelper, that
> insert shell snippets into maintainer scripts, flex/bison.
There is some controversy ab
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > ... generated cpp source files in qevercloud ...
>>
>> That is generated from Evernote Cloud API Thrift IDL files [1], an abstract
>> description of Evernote Cloud API, and generated files should be considered
>> as part of the source code.
Your message dated Sat, 3 Sep 2016 22:03:49 + (UTC)
with message-id <435957633.1580497.1472940229...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#836524: RFS: runit/2.1.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #836524,
regarding RFS: runit/2.1.2-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 08:25:01PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > Why not #debian-packaging?
>
> It is unrelated to Debian so includes no debian- prefix.
It sounds like being related to deb packaging only, though. Unless you want
to deal with
Hello!
As I understand Policy, Built-Using: should mention any packages, parts
of which were incorporated into binary package, including any debhelper, that
insert shell snippets into maintainer scripts, flex/bison.
Which debhelper is used to create this field, and isn't it is superseeded by
dh
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:07:52PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> 2016-08-25 5:41 GMT+08:00 Sean Whitton :
> > You claim that the upstream files are only licensed under the GPL
> > version 2 (and no later version). But looking at the headers of the .h
> > and .cpp files, the upstream author l
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit"
* Package name: runit
Version : 2.1.2-7
Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape
* Url : http://smarden.org/runit/
* Licenses: BSD-3-clause
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit"
* Package name: dh-runit
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov
* Url :
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git
* Lic
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Why not #debian-packaging?
It is unrelated to Debian so includes no debian- prefix.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
❦ 3 septembre 2016 03:49 CEST, Paul Wise :
> There have been some folks who aren't satisfied with the level of
> signal to noise on the #debian-mentors IRC channel, mainly around
> people joining who are not aiming at creating policy compliant packages
> for upload to the Debian archive. People
16 matches
Mail list logo
