Bug#836903: RFS: qevercloud/3.0.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial Evernote Cloud API library for Qt

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qevercloud" * Package name: qevercloud Version : 3.0.2+ds-1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Ivanov * URL :

cython package: relevant examples

Hello Forum, I am looking for relevant cython Debain package, one that can be used as a good example: any hint ? Thanks in advance, Jerome

cython package: meta info

Hello Forum, I am packaging my first cython package. I have noticed what looks as meta information in the distributed __init__.pxd file, something as: --8><-- # distutils: include_dirs =

Bug#836900: RFS: powerzz/1.0.1 and RFS: upshutzz/1.0.0

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors: We at AdoraDeal LLC are big fans of Debian and Open Source programs. We recently released several little programs under GPL V3.0. Among the programs we released are the two below, which I believe may fill a gap and be useful for many

Bug#836215: RFS: phalanx/25-1 [ITA]

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phalanx": * New upstream version. - New version builds with GCC 6. (Closes: #811584) this one can become a subsection of "new upstream version" > * debian/copyright: Update and change Format

Bug#836876: marked as done (RFS: lua-rexlib_2.7.2-3.1 [NMU] [RC])

Your message dated Tue, 6 Sep 2016 20:04:16 + (UTC) with message-id <1240060303.1151862.1473192256...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836876: RFS: hello/1.0-1.1 [NMU] [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #836876, regarding RFS: lua-rexlib_2.7.2-3.1 [NMU] [RC] to be marked as done.

Bug#836876: RFS: hello/1.0-1.1 [NMU] [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important   Dear mentors,   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-rexlib"  * Package name: lua-rexlib    Version : 2.7.2-3.1    Upstream Author : Reuben Thomas  * URL : https://github.com/rrthomas/lrexlib/  

Bug#836701: marked as done (RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.3-1)

Your message dated Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:35:58 + (UTC) with message-id <442713438.1107947.1473186958...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836701: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #836701, regarding RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Re: Advices for packaging a daemon of galileo

Hi Ben, Le 6 sept. 2016 1:20 AM, "Ben Finney" a écrit : > > Could you instead have the existing ‘galileo’ package install the > SystemD service, but not activate it? > > That way, anyone who installs ‘galileo’ can choose whether to enable the > service. You could

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

On 09/06/2016 11:57 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Christian Seiler , 2016-09-05, 20:33: >> Also note that there are plans to make init non-Essential in the future, > > The future is now! init is non-essential already. You can remove it > from your unstable chroot if you want to.

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

* Christian Seiler , 2016-09-05, 20:33: Also note that there are plans to make init non-Essential in the future, The future is now! init is non-essential already. You can remove it from your unstable chroot if you want to. MIPS (at least 32bit) doesn't support 64bit

Re: FTBFS: how to test fixes

hi, On 09/05/2016 09:11 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 09/05/2016 08:59 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote: >> On 09/05/2016 08:33 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: >>>Since you depend on systemd.pc, which is part of the >>>systemd package, just Build-Depend on systemd to make >>>systemd.pc