Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2016 04:28:29 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837598,
regarding RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Hello,
I usually build packages in a sid chroot using sbuild, but that stopped
working at some point:
% sudo schroot -c source:unstable-amd64-sbuild -d /root
E: 20copyfiles: cp: cannot create regular file
'/var/run/schroot/mount/unstable-amd64-sbuild-0d2f358b-da5e-41fa-8221-d416e21f9d2e/etc/res
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/e17/e17_0.21.2-1.dsc
I'd suggest renaming the source and binary packages to
'enlightenment', e17 was never the right choice of name.
Please do try to join the pkg-e team too:
https://wiki.deb
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop"
* Package name: budgie-desktop
Version : 10.2.7-1
Upstream Author : i...@solus-project.com
* URL : https://github.com/solus-project/budgie
Hi,
>I was actually referring to the original version 0.5.1-10 from the
>Debian archive.
>When you have doxygen it builds the same way you have in the version I
>uploaded. I was just reproducing the same result.
>I was not clear about it, sorry.
>In any case:
ok this makes sense now :)
BTW, w
Hi.
On 09/12/2016 12:31 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> dpkg -c steghide_0.5.1-11_amd64.deb |grep man |wc -l
> 308
I was actually referring to the original version 0.5.1-10 from the
Debian archive.
When you have doxygen it builds the same way you have in the version I
uploaded. I was just rep
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json"
* Package name: nlohmann-json
Version : 2.0.4-1
Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann
* URL : https://github.com/nlohmann/json
* License : MIT
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:14:10 + (UTC)
with message-id <2017331200.6754322.1473704050...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#835286: RFS: mmh/0.3-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #835286,
regarding RFS: mmh/0.3-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi,
>Ugh, please don't pressure me here. I am in the middle of the review process
>for Joerg's packages.
deleted, I thought you were too busy to review it, and without a bug such
requests
are easily forgotten :)
Nice to see you back on track!
thanks a lot
G.
> you are installing too many manpages.
One per binary.
> 2) dh-autoreconf and autotools-dev, please drop one (if possible)
Updated version is on mentors.
> 3) lots of binaries under /usr/bin/mh/*
> you sure you want them?
Of course. It is MH hier, after all.
Ugh, please don't pressure me here. I am in the middle of the review process
for Joerg's packages.
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 7:10 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>> Hello @all,
>
>
> LGTM, sponsoring soon if Adrian is not objecting :)
>
> (right now it is on deferred/5)
>
> G.
Hi
>Hello @all,
LGTM, sponsoring soon if Adrian is not objecting :)
(right now it is on deferred/5)
G.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
> * mmh
sounds interesting, lets see:
1)
-rw-r--r-- root/root 840 2016-08-24 06:33 ./usr/share/man/man1/mmh.1.gz
-rw-r--r-- root/root 794 2016-08-24 06:33
./usr/share/man/man1/mmhwrap.1.gz
-rw-r--r-- root/root 1065 2016-08-24 06:33 ./usr/share
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clsparse"
missing copyrights:
e.g.
Copyright 2015 Vratis, Ltd.
wrong licenses: I see lots of expat under
./src/library/kernels/*
2) usual cl missing header failure
http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distr
Hi,
>This is actually because of lack of dependency on doxygen.
>When you do not have doxygen installed, the manpages are simply not
>created with
>no errors whatsoever.
>Although when you have it there is some difference, it drops to 6 lines,
>instead
>of 300.
-> Considering build-dep doxyge
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:30:33PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >I'd prefer the defaults specified in our team policy.
> >
> > I adopted DEP-14 [1] which is supposed to be the most flexible scheme.
> >
> > The nice thing with debian/master is that it is both applicable for
> > upstream git (si
Dear Boyuan,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 08:48:15AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > - status of lemon parser currently unclear
>
> This is fixed in the RFS of qevercloud before already. Of course we are
> using the lemon parser from Debian. The bundled source code of lemon
> is discarded in the source
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 09:21:55PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> It looks like regular sponsors rely on automation these days, and
> requests without a RFS bug fall through the cracks.
What automation did you have in mind?
> Thus, it'd be good if you filed RFSes in the future.
Agreed.
--
Sea
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:26:01PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> >CMakeFiles/Makefile2:88: recipe for target
> >'library/CMakeFiles/clSPARSE.dir/all' failed
> >make[2]: *** [library/CMakeFiles/clSPARSE.dir/all] Error 2
> >...
>
> Indeed, I forgot our current OpenCL C++ setup is broken in sid:
On 12/09/16 12:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Ghislain,
when trying to build in pbuilder I get:
...
sort_by_key_uint
cd /build/clsparse-0.10.1.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_depends
"Unix Makefiles" /build/clsparse-0.10.1.0/src /build/clsparse-0.10.1.0/src/library
/build/clspa
Hi Ghislain,
when trying to build in pbuilder I get:
...
sort_by_key_uint
cd /build/clsparse-0.10.1.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && /usr/bin/cmake -E
cmake_depends "Unix Makefiles" /build/clsparse-0.10.1.0/src
/build/clsparse-0.10.1.0/src/library
/build/clsparse-0.10.1.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu
/build
control: reopen -1
control: retitle -1 RFS: hydroffice.bag/0.2.15-1 [ITP]
Re-opened. Seeking sponsorship via SoB.
Ghis
Hi,
I won't test/review, unless you want it to be uploaded in Debian
(with an RFS bug), sorry!
>1) Standards-Version is 3.9.6 because the test suite may perform remote
>network operations. I've tried to locate and disable these, but I'm not
>sure if I've gotten them all.
network is disabled
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:29:46 + (UTC)
with message-id <1352213506.6107180.1473672586...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#837474: RFS: runit/2.1.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #837474,
regarding RFS: runit/2.1.2-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:29:46 + (UTC)
with message-id <1352213506.6107180.1473672586...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#837474: RFS: runit/2.1.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #837475,
regarding RFS: dh-runit/1.6.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
25 matches
Mail list logo
