Bug#838160: RFS: globjects/0.5.0-1 [experimental]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "globjects" * Package name: globjects Version : 0.5.0-1 Upstream Author : CG Internals * URL : http://globjects.org/ * License : Expat Section :

Bug#836215: marked as done (RFS: phalanx/25-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:43:54 + (UTC) with message-id <1983109693.512573.1474145034...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#836215: RFS: phalanx/25-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #836215, regarding RFS: phalanx/25-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: Multiarch hinter on package tracker: Shall i obey ?

Hi, Quoting Thomas Schmitt (2016-09-17 17:51:16) > I saw the mouseover text "Toggle details", but the click only brought me to > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisofs# > because i have Javascript disabled. that should be reported as a bug against the tracker. Without Javascript, the default

Bug#838014: RFS: imagemagick

Le samedi 17 septembre 2016, 17:28:03 CEST Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 06:23:19PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > > > I recall you were saying something about this aiming to experimental, > > > because some SONAME changed (I didn't really checkout), which must also > > >

Bug#838149: marked as done (RFS: minetest-mod-mesecons/2016.09.13-1)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:55:47 + with message-id <20160917185545.mf7zx7syegejh...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#838149: RFS: minetest-mod-mesecons/2016.09.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #838149, regarding RFS: minetest-mod-mesecons/2016.09.13-1 to be marked

Bug#836215: RFS: phalanx/25-1 [ITA]

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:55:36 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > you might even consider fixing the actual RC bug without a new upstream > release, > let the package migrate, and upload the new version (crippled) in experimental > or later in unstable. Hi

Bug#838149: RFS: minetest-mod-mesecons/2016.09.13-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest-mod-mesecons" * Package name: minetest-mod-mesecons Version : 2016.09.13-1 Upstream Author : Mesecons Mod Developer Team and contributors * URL :

Bug#838140: RFS: zfs-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1 [NMU] -- git format-patch -- version 3

patch version 3 is just incremental to version 2. new changes are: * previously "zfs*.service" files are installed to   package zfsutils-linux, however zed.service is   renamed to zfs-zed.service by upstream, so changed   zfsutils-linux.install to avoid installing the service   twice.From

Bug#838014: RFS: imagemagick

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 06:23:19PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: > > I recall you were saying something about this aiming to experimental, > > because some SONAME changed (I didn't really checkout), which must also > > be the reason you're asking for sponsorship (=> the package will go > >

Bug#838138: marked as done (RFS: spl-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1 [NMU])

Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2016 01:26:06 +0800 with message-id

Bug#838140: RFS: zfs-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1 [NMU] -- git format-patch -- version 2

As required by aron. patch version 2 changes from patch version 1: * don't attempt to rename zfs-zed.service to zed.service,   we just follow this upstream change.   affected patch 0004From c552e462652bebf413812e761c71af8e09aeaf67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhou Mo

Bug#838140: RFS: zfs-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1 [NMU] -- git format-patch

As required by aron. From c552e462652bebf413812e761c71af8e09aeaf67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhou Mo Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:54:20 + Subject: [PATCH 1/4] dch: import upstream release 0.6.5.8 --- changelog | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git

Bug#838138: RFS: spl-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1 [NMU] -- git format-patch

As required by aron.From 02c6e7ab3ff2a1e346956bcfa1a14b1288d9cca7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhou Mo Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:46:19 + Subject: [PATCH 1/3] dch: import upstream release 0.6.5.8 --- debian/changelog | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff

Bug#838140: RFS: zfs-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1 [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org Debomatic-amd64: passing http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/zfs-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1/buildlog Sponsor-note: please wait for confirmation from zfs maintainer a...@debian.org   Dear mentors,   I am

Bug#838014: RFS: imagemagick

Le samedi 17 septembre 2016 08:50:56 CEST, vous avez écrit : > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:29:45PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick" > > great! > > > dget -x > >

Statistics to choose a Debian package to help

Hi, Is available here[1] a daily report about source packages in Debian. I believe that this report will be useful to help to choose a package for QA, adoption, etc. [1] https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/help_a_package.html Enjoy! Regards, Eriberto

Bug#838138: RFS: spl-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1 [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org Debomatic-amd64: passing http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/spl-linux/0.6.5.8-0.1/buildlog Sponsor-notice: please wait for confirmation from zfs maintainer a...@debian.org   Dear mentors,   I am

Re: Multiarch hinter on package tracker: Shall i obey ?

Hi, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Thus, marking it as Multi-Arch:foreign should be correct. Helmut Grohne wrote: > Add "Multi-Arch: foreign" to the binary package section of libisofs-doc. Ok, i will add the line in libisofs, libburn, and libisoburn control files.

Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9

Hi, 2016-09-17 11:38 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : > On 17 September 2016 at 22:43, Eriberto wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> (I removed debian-qa from Cc) >> >> Considering that you are fixing some issues that I pointed in my >> review, you need put all

Re: Multiarch hinter on package tracker: Shall i obey ?

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 04:00:28PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > i am preparing the Debian package for a new upstream release of libisofs > and see on its tracker page > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisofs > a new "action needed": > > "Multiarch hinter reports 1 issue(s)" Thank you for

Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9

On 17 September 2016 at 22:43, Eriberto wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > (I removed debian-qa from Cc) > > Considering that you are fixing some issues that I pointed in my > review, you need put all changes in 0.6.9-1 revision in d/changelog. > You shouldn't release a new

Re: Multiarch hinter on package tracker: Shall i obey ?

Hi, Quoting Thomas Schmitt (2016-09-17 16:00:28) > i am preparing the Debian package for a new upstream release of libisofs > and see on its tracker page > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisofs > a new "action needed": > > "Multiarch hinter reports 1 issue(s)" > > The link points to >

Bug#836903: RFS: qevercloud/3.0.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial Evernote Cloud API library for Qt

Hello Boyuan, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:23:48PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Yes, they are up-to-date now. The package on debian-mentors is also > updated. The packaging is in great shape. Here's a review for you. Must-fixes: --- 1. The changelog entry won't close the ITP unless you

Multiarch hinter on package tracker: Shall i obey ?

Hi, i am preparing the Debian package for a new upstream release of libisofs and see on its tracker page https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisofs a new "action needed": "Multiarch hinter reports 1 issue(s)" The link points to https://wiki.debian.org/MultiArch/Hints But where to see the

Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9

Hi Andrew, (I removed debian-qa from Cc) Considering that you are fixing some issues that I pointed in my review, you need put all changes in 0.6.9-1 revision in d/changelog. You shouldn't release a new revision (0.6.9-2). Regards, Eriberto 2016-09-17 4:47 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley

Bug#838014: RFS: imagemagick

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:29:45PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick" great! > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/imagemagick/imagemagick_6.9.5.9+dfsg-1.dsc I've

partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "partimage" build of the orphan'ed package. - it includes some fixes to address issues identified in the -1 upload (thanks for the