Bug#834268: marked as done (RFS: open-invaders/0.3-5 [ITA])

Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 04:26:17 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: open-invaders/0.3-5 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #834268, regarding RFS: open-invaders/0.3-5 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

[WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt, html, ...

Hello Forum, On 27/09/16 23:41, Thomas Goirand wrote: > debian/docs: > > * It looks like the README.rst could be transformed into .html using > sphinx. Could you do that? It'd look a lot nicer. Some software comes with a README.md, README.rst, ... which are the same version of a

Bug#838566: RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP]

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 02:48:29PM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mimerender" so, this package is in DPMT, hence I'm looking only at the git repo. blocking things: * this package doesn't seem to be using

Bug#838239: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.7-2

will do - raised local issue here to remember to look at this - https://github.com/budgie-remix/budgie-desktop/issues/3 On 27 September 2016 at 23:08, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > >>* Add patch to fix crash >>- 0003 - update to upower 0.99API to stop panel

Bug#838239: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.7-2

Hi, >* Add patch to fix crash >- 0003 - update to upower 0.99API to stop panel crash please don't forget to also fix the RPATH issue you have E binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath usr/bin/budgie-wm /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/mutter usr/bin/budgie-wm /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mutter thanks, G.

Bug#838160: marked as done (RFS: globjects/0.5.0-1 [ITP] [experimental])

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:29:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: globjects/0.5.0-1 [ITP] [experimental] has caused the Debian Bug report #838160, regarding RFS: globjects/0.5.0-1 [ITP] [experimental] to be marked as done. This

Bug#838740: marked as done (RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-2)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:28:58 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #838740, regarding RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-2 to be marked as done. This

Bug#838740: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-2

On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 11:59 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > P.S. Actually this fixes a lintian Error. > > ough! I missed it thanks! No you didn't missed it, nor did I. This lintian warning emerges only on non-amd64 architecture. :-)

Bug#838740: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-2

On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 11:59 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > P.S. Actually this fixes a lintian Error. > > ough! I missed it thanks! No you didn't missed it, nor did I. This lintian warning emerges only on non-amd64 architecture. :-)

Bug#829081: RFS: python3-adns/1.2.3-1 [ITP, NMU] -- A Python-3 port of the python-adns package

Hi Thomas, > e.g. I can understand you copyright changes, and I like it, as well as > compat level and watch file, but rules seems more complicate, maybe PYBUILD > can help here? ping? G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#838617: marked as done (RFS: python-socketpool_0.5.3-3 [RC] -- upload or nmu)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:35:24 + (UTC) with message-id <458081972.10479817.1474979724...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#838617: RFS: python-socketpool_0.5.3-3 [RC] -- upload or nmu has caused the Debian Bug report #838617, regarding RFS: python-socketpool_0.5.3-3 [RC]

Bug#838482: marked as done (RFS: netqmail/1.06-6 [RC])

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:28:31 + (UTC) with message-id <1034611214.10517397.1474979311...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#838482: RFS: netqmail/1.06-6 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #838482, regarding RFS: netqmail/1.06-6 [RC] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#838740: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-2

Hi, >P.S. Actually this fixes a lintian Error. ough! I missed it thanks! G.

Bug#838160: RFS: globjects/0.5.0-1 [experimental]

Hi >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "globjects" LGTM, sponsored. G.

Bug#838239: marked as done (RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.7-2)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:49:16 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #838239, regarding RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.7-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#838980: marked as done (RFS: python-schema/0.6.5-1)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:58:14 + (UTC) with message-id <124716.10404314.1474973895...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#838980: RFS: python-schema/0.6.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #838980, regarding RFS: python-schema/0.6.5-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#838980: RFS: python-schema/0.6.5-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-schema" * Package name: python-schema Version : 0.6.5-1 * License : Expat Section : python It builds those binary packages: pypy-schema - simple

Re: Libraries with "extra" priority?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:55:21AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > >This "must" policy requirement has long gone past "pointless" deep into the > > >"actively harmful" land. It is universally ignored, and I'd advise you to > > >do so too. > > > > what about changing the policy? I admit I never

Bug#838964: marked as done (RFS: dh-haskell/0.3 )

Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:13:15 + (UTC) with message-id <1405898293.10200237.1474963995...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#838964: RFS: dh-haskell/0.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #838964, regarding RFS: dh-haskell/0.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#838964: RFS: dh-haskell/0.3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-haskell" * Package name: dh-haskell Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov * Url :