Bug#835274: dh-text no longer needed

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On 11/18/2016 08:34 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > [2016-11-16 13:09] Christian Seiler >> Am 16. November 2016 10:28:41 MEZ, schrieb Dmitry Bogatov : >>> * Drop diet libc build due issues with errno >> >> As a current

Bug#835274: dh-text no longer needed

[2016-11-16 13:09] Christian Seiler > Am 16. November 2016 10:28:41 MEZ, schrieb Dmitry Bogatov : > > * Drop diet libc build due issues with errno > > As a current co-maintainer of dietlibc in Debian, could you elaborate > here? I've spent the last couple of

Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client

control: tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed control: noowner -1 I consider d648533e5f1d9942a07cb9e907eec2d58b1965fb ready for upload. On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:47:59PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > A missing dependency libqt4-sql-sqlite caused this problem. It seems that > the automatic dh_shlibdeps

Re: Does license statement be included in each project file?

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Chiara Marmo wrote: > To avoid misunderstanding, does the license statement be included in each > project file? If we can reasonably assume that those files are under the same license as the rest of the project, then this is is not required. Personally, I would

Bug#844577: openldap is NEW

On 17 November 2016 at 16:37, Ryan Tandy wrote: > > Thank you very much! May I also contact you about sponsoring future uploads? I prefer if people who are more familiar with the package does to job. I can do in extreme cases like this: RC bugs, Luca Bruno being busy, etc.

Bug#844577: openldap is NEW

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 01:30:48PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: just uploaded the package, which is now in the NEW queue. Thank you very much! May I also contact you about sponsoring future uploads? Also, if the package is finally accepted, please check some of the lintian

Bug#844577: openldap is NEW

Hi, just uploaded the package, which is now in the NEW queue. @Ryan, please, keep an eye here, perhaps the ftp-masters ask for some changes. Also, if the package is finally accepted, please check some of the lintian warnings the package is producing. Some seems trivial, other would require a

Bug#844608: RFS: protobuf/3.0.0-7.1 [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: t...@beamnet.de Clarification: * This NMU adds binary package python3-protobuf (#836821), I've sent a patch there a month ago but got no response from maintainer. see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836821

Bug#844599: RFS: confget/2.0.0-2 -- updated packaging

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a new Debian upload of my package "confget" to refresh some aspects of the Debian packaging. * Package name: confget Version : 2.0.0-2 Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev

Re: Debian privacy policy

Hello Ole, On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:05:43AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hmm, I rather would like to cite the consensus itself than its > reflection. Johannes is right that policy should be updated, but in general, it's inevitable that policy lags behind our consensus on what a good package

Re: Does license statement be included in each project file?

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Chiara Marmo wrote: > To avoid misunderstanding, does the license statement be included in > each project file? It only needs to be included if required to avoid misunderstanding. If the situation is clear from COPYING, it's fine. -- Sean Whitton

Does license statement be included in each project file?

Hello, I'm packaging the Aravis library[1] to include it in debian-astro blend. The license is clearly identified in the COPYING[2] file, but in some files (Makefiles for example, or XML metadata, and some .h files) license is not included in the header. There is one file[3] with explicit

Re: RFS: igmpproxy/0.1-1 [ITP]

On Sunday 30 October 2016 18:31:39 Pali Rohár wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy" > > * Package name: igmpproxy >Version : 0.1-1 >Upstream Author : Constantin Baranov

Re: Debian privacy policy

Hi, Quoting Ole Streicher (2016-11-17 10:11:42) > Paul Wise writes: > > AFAICT we don't have an official statement about this, but: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2008/02/msg00060.html [...] > > Is there a reason why it is not there? I guess because nobody wrote a

Bug#828978: RFS: install-mimic/0.2.0-1 (ITP)

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:12:24PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "install-mimic". > It's a tool that I've found useful time and again when installing > an updated version of a

Re: Debian privacy policy

Paul Wise writes: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: >> a reference that Debian prefers strong privacy > > AFAICT we don't have an official statement about this, but: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2008/02/msg00060.html [...] Is there a reason why

Re: Debian privacy policy

Sean Whitton writes: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:17:32PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: >> for a discussion with upstream (removal of a default "anonymously >> logging home" feature), I would like to have a reference that Debian >> prefers strong privacy (no default

Bug#844577: RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-1 [RC]

On Thursday, 17 November 2016 08:56:54 UTC Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 17 November 2016 at 04:15, Ryan Tandy wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: important > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor to upload an updated openldap package.

Bug#844577: RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-1 [RC]

On 17 November 2016 at 04:15, Ryan Tandy wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor to upload an updated openldap package. The > package can be found on alioth: > Hi, ping me if Luca Bruno is not sponsoring this