Bug#847015: RFS: debdelta/0.55+nmu1 [RC] [NMU]

2016-12-04 Thread Carlos Maddela
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Tags: newcomer Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "debdelta" * Package name: debdelta Version : 0.55+nmu1 Upstream Author : A Mennucc1 * URL : http://debdelta.debian.net *

Bug#847004: RFS: soci/3.2.3-2

2016-12-04 Thread Bill Blough
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "soci" * Package name: soci Version : 3.2.3-2 Upstream Author : soci developers * URL : http://soci.sourceforge.net * License : Boost Software

Re: Problems with openssl when upgrading r-bioc-rtracklayer

2016-12-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi James, On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:28:12PM +, James Cowgill wrote: > > PKG_CHECK_MODULES(OPENSSL, [openssl >= 1.0], [OPENSSL="yes"], > > [OPENSSL="no"]) > > > > in configure.ac - I have no idea why this fails. Any helpful hint? > > Do you have pkg-config installed? Thanks for the

Re: Problems with openssl when upgrading r-bioc-rtracklayer

2016-12-04 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, On 12/04/2016 08:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried to upgrade r-bioc-rtracklayer[1] to the latest upstream version > (see trunk in SVN) but the build failed with: > > * installing *source* package 'rtracklayer' ... > ./configure: line 1676: syntax error near unexpected token `OPENSSL,' >

Re: Problems with openssl when upgrading r-bioc-rtracklayer

2016-12-04 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On 04/12/16 19:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried to upgrade r-bioc-rtracklayer[1] to the latest upstream version > (see trunk in SVN) but the build failed with: > > * installing *source* package 'rtracklayer' ... > ./configure: line 1676: syntax error near unexpected token `OPENSSL,' >

Problems with openssl when upgrading r-bioc-rtracklayer

2016-12-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I tried to upgrade r-bioc-rtracklayer[1] to the latest upstream version (see trunk in SVN) but the build failed with: * installing *source* package 'rtracklayer' ... ./configure: line 1676: syntax error near unexpected token `OPENSSL,' ./configure: line 1676: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(OPENSSL,

Bug#846979: RFS: freedroidrpg/0.16.1-2

2016-12-04 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freedroidrpg" * Package name: freedroidrpg Version : 0.16.1-2 Upstream Author : (long list) * URL : http://freedroid.sourceforge.net/ * License :

Bug#846974: RFS: bit-babbler/0.6~bpo8+1

2016-12-04 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my updated bpo of "bit-babbler" Package name: bit-babbler Version : 0.6~bpo8+1 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: bit-babbler - BitBabbler hardware TRNG and kernel

Bug#846973: RFS: sndio/1.1.0-3~bpo8+1

2016-12-04 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my updated bpo of "sndio" Package name: sndio Version : 1.1.0-3~bpo8+1 Section : sound It builds these binary packages: libsndio-dev - Small audio and MIDI framework from OpenBSD,

Bug#843636: marked as done (RFS: gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi/3.22.14-1 ITP: 843633 -- disconnect wifi extension for GNOME shell)

2016-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Dec 2016 14:37:10 +0100 with message-id <1480858630.15207.8.ca...@frost.de> and subject line Re: Bug#843636: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi/3.22.14, ITP: 843633 -- disconnect wifi extension for GNOME shell has caused the Debian Bug report #843636, regarding

Bug#846325: RFS: netperfmeter/1.6.1-1

2016-12-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, sorry for stepping in so late, I would just like to add a copyright :) ./src/flow.cc: * Copyright (C) 2013 by Sebastian Wallat (TCP No delay) ./src/flowtrafficspec.cc: * Copyright (C) 2013 by Sebastian Wallat (TCP No delay) ./src/flowtrafficspec.h: * Copyright (C) 2013 by Sebastian Wallat

Bug#846325: RFS: netperfmeter/1.6.1-1

2016-12-04 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Hi Thomas, required fixes for uploads: - d/changelog: The entries for not released Debian versions should be deleted (preferred) or marked as UNRELEASED. You also can concentrate all entries not part of a prior (Debian) release into the most recent

Bug#846546: RFS: ora2pg/17.6-1 [RC] [QA]

2016-12-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
reopen 846546 tags 846546 moreinfo owner 846546 ! thanks signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#843394: marked as done (RFS: zfs-auto-snapshot/1.2.1-1 ITP 720657: -- ZFS automatic snapshots)

2016-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 04 Dec 2016 10:58:11 +0100 with message-id <1480845491.15207.1.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: zfs-auto-snapshot/13, ITP 720657: -- ZFS automatic snapshots has caused the Debian Bug report #843394, regarding RFS: zfs-auto-snapshot/1.2.1-1 ITP 720657: -- ZFS

Bug#843636: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi/3.22.14, ITP: 843633 -- disconnect wifi extension for GNOME shell

2016-12-04 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Freitag, den 11.11.2016, 20:18 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost: > control: owner -1 ! > > Hi Jonathan, > > Can you rebuild locale/*.mo during build? > Otherwise it is fine! > > -- > tobi > ping :) -- tobi

Bug#846899: marked as done (RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info/20161204-1)

2016-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Dec 2016 09:50:11 +0100 with message-id <20161204085011.gymn5ljqeivlm...@coldtobi.de> and subject line Re: Bug#846899: RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info/20161204-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #846899, regarding RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info/2016

Bug#846906: marked as done (RFS: xoscope/2.2-1)

2016-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 4 Dec 2016 09:37:43 +0100 with message-id <20161204083742.n5w6xp3aqysnw...@coldtobi.de> and subject line Re: Bug#846906: RFS: xoscope/2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #846906, regarding RFS: xoscope/2.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the