Bug#838941: marked as done (RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta4-1 ITP)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:02:34 +0100 with message-id <20161224050234.zjxe36ie6dmha...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #838941, regarding RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta4-1 ITP to be marked as done. This means

Bug#849193: marked as done (RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.0-1)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2016 22:24:22 +0100 with message-id <20161223212420.ok4m2hudpbejh...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#849193: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #849193, regarding RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

On Friday 23 December 2016 14:46:53 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hi again Pali Rohár, > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Now lintian on mentors shows warning: > > > > package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version > > 10 > > Yes, lintian is simply

Bug#832941: RFS: 4pane (debian: to exclusive)

Dear Sean, Many thanks for your further input. >Here's another review, based on your 4pane-debian-dir repo. >Must-fixes >1. At least one of the files added by AddExtraM4Files.patch isn't accounted >for in d/copyright. //snip >9. Lots of files in .build/ are not accounted for in d/copyright.

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hi again Pali Rohár, On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > Now lintian on mentors shows warning: > > package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version > 10 Yes, lintian is simply wrong/outdated here. It's just a tool to help you find issues, don't blindly follow lintian

Bug#842166: renewed sponsorship-request

I uploaded a new version of findent: https://mentors.debian.net/package/findent https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/findent/findent_2.7.3-1.dsc The package is now build in chrooted sid. Please have a look again. Regards, Willem

Bug#849193: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid": * Package name: hoteldruid Version : 2.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis * URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com * License : AGPLv3

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

On 2016-12-17 22:27, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hello, Files: interval_tree.c interval_tree_generic.h Copyright: 2012 Michel Lespinasse License: GPL-2 which then below lists GPL-2 license with address: Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:28:39AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! Now I uploaded new version to mentors. > [...] > So I cannot use init-d-script easily. [...] Thanks for following up with a good explanation for the choices you make. [...] > Reasons why I did not install systemd service file:

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hello, On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:18:03AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > Hi there, > > sorry for the formatting, writing this on my phone. > > > Am 23. Dezember 2016 10:18:52 MEZ, schrieb Andreas Henriksson > : [...] > >on upstream issue #2. > > I'm not sure that'll work.

Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:22:08PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello > > > > >I completely missed that part of the sentence, sorry. Any > >particular reason why you prefer it that way? (To me it seems > >logical the other way around, since the preprocessor is run > >before the

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

On Friday 23 December 2016 11:28:39 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > - debian/compat: why only 9? compat 10 is considered stable now > > > > > >and unless you have a good reason I would recommend that any > > >new package should use compat 10. (please read the debhelper > > >manual though

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hi! Now I uploaded new version to mentors. On Friday 23 December 2016 10:18:52 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello, > > Started looking at this bug report yesterday but got discracted... > > I spotted much the same issues as Chrisian so I'll instead just > echo what he's saying and add a few

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hi there, sorry for the formatting, writing this on my phone. Am 23. Dezember 2016 10:18:52 MEZ, schrieb Andreas Henriksson : >On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:12:17AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> - init.d: this file name works with dh_installinit, but is not >>

Bug#849018: marked as done (RFS: kakoune/0~2016.12.20.1.3a6167ae-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:02:43 +0100 with message-id <20161223100243.ior3b374a6xhj...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#849018: RFS: kakoune/0~2016.12.20.1.3a6167ae-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #849018, regarding RFS: kakoune/0~2016.12.20.1.3a6167ae-1 [ITP] to be

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

Hello, Started looking at this bug report yesterday but got discracted... I spotted much the same issues as Chrisian so I'll instead just echo what he's saying and add a few comments. (I'll be able to sponsor you once the package is ready.) On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:12:17AM +0100, Christian

Bug#838941: RFS: duperemove/0.11~beta3-3 ITP

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:12:04PM +0100, peter.zahrad...@znik.sk wrote: > * Package name: duperemove Uhm guys, what's the status on this? Unless you upload by pretty much today, there's little chance it will get into stretch -- the effective freeze date is in unstable (ie, past NEW) by Dec