Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU package "python-parse"
* Package name: python-parse
Version : 1.6.3-1.1
Upstream Author : Richard Jones
* URL : https://github.com/r1chardj0n3s/parse
* License
Paul Wise schreef op 2016-07-30 09:16:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
Do you really demand that a Debian package can generate windows
executables, and booting floppies in double density?
We already have tested and working GCC cross-compilers for Windows.
https:/
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:26:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: wok/2.3.1-1 [ITP] - Webserver Originated from
Kimchi
has caused the Debian Bug report #847105,
regarding RFS: wok/2.3.1-1 [ITP] - Webserver Originated from Kimchi
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:05:04 +0100
with message-id <20170112180504.jyb53cw3pxqr5...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#850487: RFS: terminaltables/3.1.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #850487,
regarding RFS: terminaltables/3.1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:06:14 +0100
with message-id <20170112170614.itnma7iyoclsq...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#851097: RFS: par2cmdline/0.6.14-2 -- PAR 2.0
compatible file verification and repair tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #851097,
regarding RFS: par2cmdline/0.
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:10:46 + (UTC), Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >Would it be possible to do a 2.7.1-6 version of the package in unstable
> >with the patches from Zesty so that we have this improvement in stretch,
> >even if 2.7.3 is available ? Or do I need to have to upgrad
Hello,
>Would it be possible to do a 2.7.1-6 version of the package in unstable
>with the patches from Zesty so that we have this improvement in stretch,
>even if 2.7.3 is available ? Or do I need to have to upgrade to the very
>latest version available that is 2.7.3 ?
this is up to you, a -6 h
I'm continuing here the discussion started in bug #850918.
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:43:36 + (UTC), Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >Do you think it's reasonable ?
>
> you might miss stretch release then :/
.. indeed.
> https://release.debian.org/
>
> your call, it was just a sug
It's all good. Thanks a lot, Sean 😊
On Jan 11, 2017 4:13 PM, "Sean Whitton" wrote:
Dear Taylor,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 06:51:56PM -0600, Taylor Kline wrote:
> Ooh okay. Thank you 😊
>
> So how do non-DDs help out with providing patches?
My last e-mail was overly curt. Sorry about that.
As ot
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:04:15 + (UTC)
with message-id <1071357257.6375084.1484229855...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#850918: RFS: rear/2.00+dfsg-1 ITP: rear -- Bare metal
disaster recovery and system migration framework
has caused the Debian Bug report #850918,
regar
Updated packaging :
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rear/rear_2.00+dfsg-1.dsc
Hello Andreas,
thanks for having a look at the packaging and letting me know for
asciidoc. Indeed, the move is interesting and asciidoc-base seems enough
for the generation of the documentation.
Other fixe
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2017 05:52:38 -0500
with message-id <58775ff6.7040...@piedmont.edu>
and subject line mathicgb uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #851068,
regarding RFS: mathicgb/1.0~git20170104-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hello,
>https://release.debian.org/britney/update_output.txt OTOH says:
>
>trying: sunpy
>skipped: sunpy (0, 0, 255)
>got: 36+0: a-3:i-23:a-0:a-0:a-0:m-0:m-7:m-0:p-0:s-3
>* s390x: python-sunpy, python3-sunpy
this usually means (if I'm correct) that the new sunpy makes python-sunpy
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:33:58AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I still do not completely understand all causes why a package does not
>> migrate:
>>
>> sinpy is a valida candidate but doesn't migrate. None of the pages shows
>> a reason:
>>
>> https://q
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:23:32 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: bundlewrap/2.12.2-1 [ITP] --
Decentralizedconfiguration management system with Python
has caused the Debian Bug report #842026,
regarding RFS: bundlewrap/2.12.2-1 [ITP] -- Decentralizedconfiguration
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:00:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#842166: fixed in findent 2.7.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #842166,
regarding RFS: findent-2.7.3-1 [ITP] -- indent / convert Fortran source
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:33:58AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I still do not completely understand all causes why a package does not
> migrate:
>
> sinpy is a valida candidate but doesn't migrate. None of the pages shows
> a reason:
>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sunpy
Hi,
I still do not completely understand all causes why a package does not
migrate:
sinpy is a valida candidate but doesn't migrate. None of the pages shows
a reason:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sunpy
https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html#sunpy
At the same time, o
[2017-01-11 03:09] ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
> It has been closed by Sean Whitton .
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eoconv"
>
> Uploaded.
Thanks.
> A suggestion: consider installing README.md.
Already considered. Not worth it, IMHO.
--
X-Web-Site: https
19 matches
Mail list logo
