Re: watch file with multiple download url

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:47 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > so it seems that I have a problem with the upstream versioning ... > the final release is tango-9.2.5a which is considered lower than > tango-9.2.5-rcx > > how should I change my watch file to take this into account. This has

RE:watch file with multiple download url

> uscan works out of the box with both URLs as far as I can tell. you I uncomment everythongs and uscan check at bothe URL compares the version and at the end download the most recent package from the right URL ? ok, I uncomment both URL and now I get this version=4

Bug#835274: bcron

[2017-01-12 20:00] Gianfranco Costamagna > >I consider disabling mentioned three tests (exec-fds, > >spool-list-perms,sched_dump). WDYT? > > probably the best solution right now Did it. New revision is on mentors, hash commit in git is fbd6d60. -- X-Web-Site:

Re: watch file with multiple download url

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:01 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > No issues, I just wanted to know if I could have something with uscan which > work out of the box with both URL's. > So I would like something without the comment / uncomment trick. uscan works out of the box with both URLs as

Re: git-p4 package?

Dear Luke, On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:27:22PM +, Luke Diamand wrote: > I put in a patch to add a git-p4 package, here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773245 > > I was wondering what I need to do next for this to be merged? Or if > I've done it wrong somehow? I

mpgrafic - mpirun test program as root in automatic build

hi Debian-mentors, Is it reasonable to override the mpirun (openmpi_2.0.2~git.20161225-8) default preference of refusing to run as root? I've started packaging mpgrafic for debian - this is my first debianisation, apart from minor private hacks after extracting debian source packages:

Bug#844184: RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]

[sorry, this got stuck in my drafts folder] Dear Nicholas, On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:26:44PM -0700, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Thank you again for your patience and extra help! No problem. I hope that this was educational for you as a new DM -- that's probably more important than the updated

git-p4 package?

Hi! I put in a patch to add a git-p4 package, here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773245 I was wondering what I need to do next for this to be merged? Or if I've done it wrong somehow? Thanks Luke

Bug#844184: marked as done (RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:23:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #844184, regarding RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#851606: RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rmlint" * Package name: rmlint Version : 2.4.6-1 Upstream Author : Christopher Pahl * URL : https://rmlint.readthedocs.io/ * License

RE:watch file with multiple download url

> Just uncommenting both seems to work for me, what issue do you get? No issues, I just wanted to know if I could have something with uscan which work out of the box with both URL's. So I would like something without the comment / uncomment trick. Cheers

Re: watch file with multiple download url

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:34 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Here my current watch content where I comment and uncomment the URL. Just uncommenting both seems to work for me, what issue do you get? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

watch file with multiple download url

Hello, for one of my package, I need to check at two location for new upstream release. the official release are usually located on sourceforge. but rc's are usually provided via their internal ftp. This is important for me to be able to prepare experimental upload of the rc's. so I would like