Bug#847941: RFS: libvecpf/1.1.0-1 ITP: libvecpf -- Vector Printf Library

Hi Frederic, currently I'm short on time and as new packages are currently not the priority (won't be part of Stretch anyway) please let me defer that to past-freeze. Ping me again then and I'll take a look. -- tobi Am Mittwoch, den 11.01.2017, 09:58 +0100 schrieb Frederic Bonnard: > Hi Tobias,

Bug#851937: RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "farbfeld" * Package name : farbfeld Version : 2.20170109-1 Upstream Author : Laslo Hunhold * Url : http://tools.suckless.org/farbfeld *

Bug#851936: RFS: openmeca/2.1.5-1 [ITP: #850590]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my first package "openmeca" * Package name: openmeca * Version : 2.1.5-1 * Upstream Author : Damien André (myself) * URL : https://gitlab.com/damien.andre/openmeca * License

Re: Backporting shibboleth-sp2 2.6.0+dfsg1-4 to jessie: dh-systemd, piuparts and lintian errors

Etienne Dysli-Metref writes: > Since shibboleth-sp2 2.6.0+dfsg1-4 migrated to testing during the > holidays, I'm now backporting it to jessie. So far there is nothing to > change, however piuparts gives me the following error (which does not > appear on stretch):

Re: mpgrafic - mpirun test program as root in automatic build

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:21:36AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > This is temporarily false: #852071 > > Is there a typo in that bug? I get a 404 #851071, sorry! -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: OpenMPI rpath entries (Was: question on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath)

Hm, I'm now getting errors from dpkg-shlibdeps (i.e., and installation time): ``` dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libtrilinos_trilinosss.so.12 needed by debian/libtrilinos-amesos12/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_amesos.so.12.11 (ELF format: 'elf64-powerpcle'; RPATH:

Bug#851799: RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1

control: tag -1 +moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Dear Ervin, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:39:34PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hamlib" Thanks for your RFS. Some issues with this upload: - debhelper compat bump not in changelog - debhelper build-dep

Bug#851884: RFS: fdkaac/0.6.3-1

Sean Whitton writes: > Dear Marius, > > Could you update your Vcs-Git repository with the new version, please? Dear Sean, My Vcs-Git ( https://git.ieval.ro/git/fdkaac.git ) already has the new version. -- Marius Gavrilescu signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#851884: RFS: fdkaac/0.6.3-1

Dear Marius, Could you update your Vcs-Git repository with the new version, please? -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#851884: RFS: fdkaac/0.6.3-1

Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:30:39PM +, Marius Gavrilescu wrote: >> * Mark as XS-Autobuild: yes > Why do you think you need that in a contrib package? That... is a great point! It only makes sense for non-free packages. I believe I added that

Bug#851884: RFS: fdkaac/0.6.3-1

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:30:39PM +, Marius Gavrilescu wrote: > * Mark as XS-Autobuild: yes Why do you think you need that in a contrib package? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bonjour

Besoin d'argent pour un projet personnel??? Contactez nous pour plus d'informations pour obtenir un prêt. --- L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Bug#851884: RFS: fdkaac/0.6.3-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fdkaac" * Package name: fdkaac Version : 0.6.3-1 Upstream Author : nu774 * URL : https://github.com/nu774/fdkaac * License :

Re: OpenMPI rpath entries (Was: question on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath)

I can confirm that the RPATH is ``` RPATH: ':/usr//lib:/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib' ``` I'll just wait for the next ompi upload then. Cheers, Nico On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:10 PM Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > > On 19/01/2017 11:20, James Cowgill wrote: > >

Re: OpenMPI rpath entries (Was: question on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath)

On 19/01/2017 11:20, James Cowgill wrote: > Hi, > > On 18/01/17 22:39, Nico Schlömer wrote: >> I'm co-maintaining the Trilinos package [1] in Debian and recently found >> a bunch of new lintian warnings of the kind >> binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath [2]. It say in the description of the warning:

Re: OpenMPI rpath entries (Was: question on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath)

On 19/01/17 12:20, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Le 19/01/2017 à 12:20, James Cowgill a écrit : >> On a separate note: does this interfere with the alternatives system >> which openmpi currently has? If an rpath is used, it will override any >> libraries in the default linker search path so even if the

Re: OpenMPI rpath entries (Was: question on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath)

Le 19/01/2017 à 12:20, James Cowgill a écrit : > On a separate note: does this interfere with the alternatives system > which openmpi currently has? If an rpath is used, it will override any > libraries in the default linker search path so even if the mpi > alternative is changed, many

Re: OpenMPI rpath entries (Was: question on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath)

Hi, On 18/01/17 22:39, Nico Schlömer wrote: > I'm co-maintaining the Trilinos package [1] in Debian and recently found > a bunch of new lintian warnings of the kind > binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath [2]. It say in the description of the warning: > ``` > To fix this problem, look for link lines

Re: question on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath

Hello Nico, >I'm co-maintaining the Trilinos package [1] in Debian and recently found a >bunch of new lintian warnings of the kind binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath [2]. >It say in >the description of the warning: Usually lintian is right on such tags :p You can look at src:ettercap, where I

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

Hello >This is alpha version. It is not in upstream changelog on [1]. something I wondered too, maybe tagging it differently from official releases might help >To be noted upstream author does not always publish the tags in time. > >P.S.: I don't know how to put this remote changelog into the

Re: question on binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath

Thanks Sean for the reply. > If so, it's probably a Lintian bug. I thought it might be. Just filed a bug for it [1]. Cheers, Nico [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851833 On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:50 AM Sean Whitton wrote: Dear Nico, On Wed,