Bug#854656: RFS: roadfighter/1.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Relive a classic racing game with this remake

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roadfighter" * Package name: roadfighter Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL :

Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Yes, but those docs didn't provide info detailed enough for me to start. > Probably I too much rely on the high level tools, and lack of ability > to use plumbing level tools such as dpkg-*. I think most people encounter all these tools

Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

Disclaimer: longtime apt contributor On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:49:32PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >> apt build-dep (dsc-file) to build-dependencies> > >I remember "apt build-dep " is only for package already > >exists in archive. > > when the argument is a dsc file, apt parses the

Re: Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

> On 8 Feb 2017, at 14:49, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: >>> apt build-dep (dsc-file) to build-dependencies> > >> I remember "apt build-dep " is only for package already > >> exists in archive. > > > > when the argument is a dsc file, apt parses the dependency

Bug#840739: RFS: gudhi/1.3.1+ds-1 [ITP]

On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:46:46 CET Roger Shimizu wrote: > Dear Gard, > > I cannot sponsor the upload. But here's my review that I hope it's helpful. Dear Roger, Thank you very much for your helpful feedback. I believe I have rectified some of the below. > Here're the items need to be

Re: Cleaning packaging files with Lintian

❦ 8 février 2017 19:56 +0100, Narcis Garcia  : > I have this error from Lintian output: > E: ntfsundelete-tree: maintainer-address-malformed Narcis Garcia > > > How can I better mask e-mail address in control file? It needs to be machine-readable to let you receive bug

Re: Cleaning packaging files with Lintian

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 07:56:42PM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote: > I have this error from Lintian output: > E: ntfsundelete-tree: maintainer-address-malformed Narcis Garcia > > > How can I better mask e-mail address in control file? You don't. And once you write to any public Debian mailing list

Cleaning packaging files with Lintian

I have this error from Lintian output: E: ntfsundelete-tree: maintainer-address-malformed Narcis Garcia How can I better mask e-mail address in control file? Thanks. -- __ I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't masked enough at this list's archives.

Bug#854212: RFS: synergy/1.8.7-stable+dfsg.1-1 [ITA]

[2017-02-06 09:08] Arturo Borrero Gonzalez > > part text/plain 639 > On 5 February 2017 at 07:12, Joshua Honeycutt > wrote: > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > > > dget -x > >

Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

Hi, >> apt build-dep (dsc-file) to build-dependencies> >I remember "apt build-dep " is only for package already >exists in archive. when the argument is a dsc file, apt parses the dependency list. (IIRC this is a feature since apt 1.0 or 1.1) G.

Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

Dear Sean, Gianfranco, Thanks for your feedback! On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > > I've made some edits. > > Your page should probably discuss sbuild/pbuilder. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna

Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

Hi,>Yes, but those docs didn't provide info detailed enough for me to start. >Probably I too much rely on the high level tools, and lack of ability >to use plumbing level tools such as dpkg-*. a low-level manual is something nice to have... I propose some additions for non-new packages: "dget

Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

Dear Roger, On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:50:32PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > During my attempt to review RFS package in mentors list, I find > actually there's no good manual for this activity. > > At first I even don't know what to do with the downloaded .dsc and two > tarballs, because my

Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > >> During my attempt to review RFS package in mentors list, I find actually >> there's no good manual for this activity. > > Did you see the existing documentation? > >

Re: [RFC] How to review RFS package

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > During my attempt to review RFS package in mentors list, I find actually > there's no good manual for this activity. Did you see the existing documentation? http://mentors.debian.net/intro-reviewers https://wiki.debian.org/SponsorChecklist

[RFC] How to review RFS package

Dear mentors, During my attempt to review RFS package in mentors list, I find actually there's no good manual for this activity. At first I even don't know what to do with the downloaded .dsc and two tarballs, because my previous experience was all using high level packaging tool, such as

Bug#849273: RFS: gemmlowp/0~20161216-gb56df4a-1 [ITP]

Control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear lumin, On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 11:44 PM, lumin wrote: > > * Package name: gemmlowp >Version : 0~20161216-gb56df4a-1 Thanks for your clean packaging! I cannot sponsor the upload, just a few comments after reviewing your

Bug#840739: RFS: gudhi/1.3.1+ds-1 [ITP]

Control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Gard, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Gard Spreemann wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gudhi" > > * Package name : gudhi >Version : 1.3.1+ds-1 >Upstream Author : Gudhi Project / INRIA > * URL

Bug#846762: marked as done (RFS: fonts-genericons/3.4.1-1 [ITP] -- vector icons embedded in a webfont)

Your message dated Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:13:23 +0900 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#846762: RFS: fonts-genericons/3.4.1-1[ITP] -- vector icons embedded in a webfont has caused the Debian Bug report #846762, regarding