Bug#833193: closed by Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> (Closing inactive ITP RFSs)

control: owner -1 ! Hello again Ben, Thank you for your response to my previous review. On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 08:06:36PM +, Ben Albrecht wrote: > >5. The UTF-8 decoder needs to be packaged separately -- Debian strongly > >discourages convenience copies of code. It might already be

Bug#854706: RFS: spyder-unittest/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spyder-unittest" * Package name: spyder-unittest   Version : 0.1.0-1   Upstream Author : The Spyder Project Contributors * URL :

Bug#854693: RFS: tslib/1.5-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tslib" * Package name: tslib Version : 1.5-1 Upstream Author : [Martin Kepplinger ] * URL : [https://github.com/kergoth/tslib] * License

Bug#845710: removed Vcs fields

The Vcs-* links are removed since the debian directory is not included in the official repo.

Bug#854682: RFS: pytest-xvfb/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pytest-xvfb": * Package name: pytest-xvfb Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Florian Bruhin * URL :

Re: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate

__ I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service administrator should fix this. El 09/02/17 a les 12:43, Andrey Rahmatullin ha escrit: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:15:58PM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote: >>

Bug#851606: RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP]

Control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Carlos, I cannot sponsor the upload. But here's my review that I hope it's helpful. On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Carlos Maddela wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rmlint" > > * Package name: rmlint >Version

Re: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:10:08PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote: > > And I don't find any documentation about this message. > lintian-info -t > > Or you could google it and find >

Re: Bug#851789: RFS: python-h5netcdf/0.3.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 13:23 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 10:16:26AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Since this source package is now targetting the Buzz release cycle, > > I'm afraid you're too late for that, either. s/Buzz/Buster indeed!

Bug#849313: RFS: mate-equake-applet/1.3.8-1 [ITP]

Control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Jeroen, Thanks for your packaging work! I cannot sponsor the upload, but here're a few comments after reviewing your package. On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package

Re: Bug#851789: RFS: python-h5netcdf/0.3.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 10:16:26AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Since this source package is now targetting the Buzz release cycle, I'm afraid you're too late for that, either. -- Autotools hint: to do a zx-spectrum build on a pdp11 host, type: ./configure --host=zx-spectrum

Re: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:15:58PM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote: > Sorry; I used DuckDuckGo. > I had seen that page, Yet you said "I don't find any documentation about this message" > but didn't identify which paragraphs is referred to. The description mentions words "Please also look if..." --

Re: binary-without-manpage

Thanks, I have now a clean Lintian result. In documentation, some files seem to be optional, some simply required, and some files or methods seem to be required only one of various (and didn't see if one or all) Let's see now if DFSG requires my program to be presented as current or in a

Re: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate

Sorry; I used DuckDuckGo. I had seen that page, but didn't identify which paragraphs is referred to. Hilmar solution worked. Thanks. __ I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service administrator should

Re: binary-without-manpage

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 10:26:02AM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote: > I (only) created the file "debian/ntfsundelete-tree.8" (without > referring it anywhere), and I get this Lintian warning: > W: ntfsundelete-tree: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/ntfsundelete-tree > > Where do I need to register the

Re: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 11:30:25AM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote: > And I don't find any documentation about this message. lintian-info -t Or you could google it and find https://lintian.debian.org/tags/copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate.html which is the same thing. -- WBR, wRAR

Re: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate

Am 09.02.2017 um 11:30 tastete Narcis Garcia: Hi, This Lintian result is an error*:* E: ntfsundelete-tree: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate And I don't find any documentation about this message. This is the copyright file:

copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate

This Lintian result is an error*:* E: ntfsundelete-tree: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate And I don't find any documentation about this message. This is the copyright file: https://git.actiu.net/libre/ntfsundelete-tree/blob/master/debian/copyright -- __ I'm using this

Bug#851789: RFS: python-h5netcdf/0.3.1-1 [ITP]

control: tags -1 moreinfo Since this source package is now targetting the Buzz release cycle, I'll update it and remove the Python 2 binary package. Ghis

binary-without-manpage

I (only) created the file "debian/ntfsundelete-tree.8" (without referring it anywhere), and I get this Lintian warning: W: ntfsundelete-tree: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/ntfsundelete-tree Where do I need to register the manpage file presence to be installed? Can I do this at "debian/install"

Directories tree in package

I'm currently building ntfsundelete-tree package with the main file specified at debian/install: ntfsundelete-tree usr/sbin - If I specify more files by this way, will do APT uninstaller remove empty directories of those files? eg.: icon.png usr/share/ntfsundelete-tree - Is this specification