Re: RFH: pyrit: FTBFS on i386, Python memory corruption?

Hi Gianfranco, Sorry for my delay. 2017-02-22 18:51 GMT-03:00 Gianfranco Costamagna : > > seems barriere wasn't so happy with my test... > Did you open an i386 chroot, right? > sessionid=$(schroot -b -c sid_i386-dchroot) > > The machine is an amd64, so you have to

Bug#856151: marked as done (RFS: gexiv2/0.10.4-2)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:48:08 -0700 with message-id <20170227024808.3j3tmtrvc6mw5...@iris.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#856151: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #856151, regarding RFS: gexiv2/0.10.4-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#856151: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.4-2

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 05:12:44PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I built the package and then ran Lintian. It produces an error > > E: libgexiv2-2: > symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on symbol > _ZN5Exiv28XmpdatumaSIlEERS0_RKT_@Base

Bug#856151: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.4-2

control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Jason, Thank you for fixing the changelog. I built the package and then ran Lintian. It produces an error E: libgexiv2-2: symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on symbol _ZN5Exiv28XmpdatumaSIlEERS0_RKT_@Base and 1 others -- Sean

Bug#856198: RFS: entropybroker/2.9-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package "entropybroker" This is rather strange. BTW since Thorsten is the maintainer, and he is active, an NMU for a bug opened some hours ago would be *totally* unappropriate. Indeed, it is also the

Bug#856198: RFS: entropybroker/2.9-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "entropybroker" I can sponsor it if you get 1) an unblock bug approved or 2) a targeted fixes for the RC bug. I admit, the new release is mostly a "fix manpage, merge debian patches, fix rc bug,

Bug#845710: removed Vcs fields

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:36:57PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Tim Kuijsten wrote: > > The Vcs-* links are removed since the debian directory is not included in > > the official repo. > > I guess you misunderstand Sean's words. > > There're

Re: Packaging a gui app

Thanks for the tips on this. I am brand new to packaging Debian products. The product I am working on packaging is https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc. My main goal with packaging it is because I am a big fan of it and I keep my systems clean so I want a pure Debian package that I can

Re: Attempt to build BioD blocked by undeaD and missing module string (Was: How to build D source)

Hi, On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > >> I just added "dub run" to debian/rules. > > > > I think you want "dub build" instead. > > Yes, `dub build` is the right thing to do, Fine. > but in general I would > strongly recommend to not use dub at all for Debian

Re: Packaging a gui app

On 02/26/2017 04:52 PM, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2017-02-26 at 10:47, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > >> On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 10:15 -0500, matt jones wrote: >> >>> I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do >>> I go about ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as

Re: [Pkg-d-devel] Attempt to build BioD blocked by undeaD and missing module string (Was: How to build D source)

Hello! 2017-02-26 15:19 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill : > Hi, > > On 26/02/17 07:03, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:01:17PM +, James Cowgill wrote: >>> On 25/02/17 21:31, Andreas Tille wrote: I intend to package BioD[1] but I have no idea how to build

Re: Packaging a gui app

On 2017-02-26 at 10:47, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 10:15 -0500, matt jones wrote: > >> I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do >> I go about ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as >> a dependency as well. The upstream maintainers

Re: Packaging a gui app

On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 10:15 -0500, matt jones wrote: > I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do I go about > ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as a dependency as well. > The upstream maintainers don’t call it out specifically but it is understood. >

Re: Packaging a gui app

Dear Matt, libqt5gui5 is already depending on the needed X libraries, so unless your app is doing something tricky, you don't need to care about this. But we can tell more if we see the application in question... Regards, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de On 02/26/2017 04:15 PM, matt jones

Re: Packaging a gui app

Dear Matt, libqt5gui5 is already depending on the needed X libraries, so unless your app is doing something tricky, you don't need to care about this. But we can tell more if we see the application in question... Regards, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de On 02/26/2017 04:15 PM, matt jones

Packaging a gui app

I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do I go about ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as a dependency as well. The upstream maintainers don’t call it out specifically but it is understood. Links to docs are always welcome. Thanks! -- Matt

Re: Attempt to build BioD blocked by undeaD and missing module string (Was: How to build D source)

Hi, On 26/02/17 07:03, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:01:17PM +, James Cowgill wrote: >> On 25/02/17 21:31, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> I intend to package BioD[1] but I have no idea how to build the D code >>> (and run the unit tests). Considering BioD is a library I might

Bug#856151: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.4-2

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 07:03:33PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > You are missing a # before the number of the bug you are closing in your > changelog. I've fixed the changelog entry. I think I got it wrong because I misread the gbp documentation on meta tags. Fixed

Bug#856198: RFS: entropybroker/2.9-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "entropybroker" * Package name: entropybroker Version : 2.9-0.1 Upstream Author : Folkert van Heusden * URL : https://www.vanheusden.com/entropybroker/ *

Bug#851756: telegram-desktop/1.0.12-1

Hi, sorry it took me some time to get to this, I've been hooked up by some real life stuff... On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:35:18PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > Oh, but they have released a new version today. few minutes/hours after this they released another one too, it seems :P They took the