Bug#861011: RFS: qt5ct/0.31-2 [ITP]

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > qt5ct - Qt5 Configuration Utility Since Lisandro is a Debian member and a co-maintainer of the package, will he be uploading this? I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here is a quick review: There do not appear to be any

Bug#861009: marked as done (RFS: gxkb/0.7.9-1)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2017 05:14:42 +0200 with message-id <20170424031442.jg2b3fjn2tyuj...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#861009: RFS: gxkb/0.7.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #861009, regarding RFS: gxkb/0.7.9-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#861008: marked as done (RFS: slim/1.3.6-5 [RC])

Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2017 05:00:38 +0200 with message-id <20170424030038.3udzvbc2rkhx4...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#861008: RFS: slim/1.3.6-5 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #861008, regarding RFS: slim/1.3.6-5 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#858454: marked as done (RFS: simple-obfs/0.0.3-1 [ITP] -- simple obfusacting plugin for shadowsocks server)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2017 22:22:25 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: simple-obfs/0.0.3-1 [ITP] -- simple obfusacting plugin for shadowsocks server has caused the Debian Bug report #858454, regarding RFS: simple-obfs/0.0.3-1 [ITP]

Bug#861010: RFS: spacefm/1.0.5-3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spacefm" * Package name: spacefm Version : 1.0.5-3 Upstream Author : IgnorantGuru * URL :

Bug#861011: RFS: qt5ct/0.31-2 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qt5ct" * Package name: qt5ct Version : 0.31-2 Upstream Author : Ilya Kotov * URL : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/qt5ct

Bug#861009: RFS: gxkb/0.7.9-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gxkb" * Package name: gxkb Version : 0.7.9-1 Upstream Author : Dmitriy Poltavchenko * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gxkb *

Bug#861008: RFS: slim/1.3.6-5 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slim" * Package name: slim Version : 1.3.6-5 Upstream Author : Nobuhiro Iwamatsu * URL :

Re: I have some questions about alioth repository

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:58:30 +0100 Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > If the corresponding Vcs-* fields in d/control are missing for these > packages, then the packaging work is not stored in a VCS. You may > generate one by calling `gbp import-dscs $PACKAGE` which will download >

Bug#849493: marked as done (RFS: vc/1.3.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:52:34 +0800 with message-id <2521210.ttdVga03QC@hosiet-tp> and subject line Bug #849493: closing RFS vc/1.3.0-1; newer version uploaded already has caused the Debian Bug report #849493, regarding RFS: vc/1.3.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

oh umm this are out of the main threat.. i want to use the archive.debian.net interface, that's all, i only have help from someone to restore, but i refuse that u said.. u are wrong, at the moment o wheeze, ejabbed was many years outdated!!! so if the problemof the out service was the

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

Hi Am 22.04.2017 um 16:35 schrieb PICCORO McKAY Lenz: [...] debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd.. and u tell me about "security" please! theres a issue related to slim, due bad integrtion with pam and systemd, see it [...] debian have many out (very out) to date