Bug#847608: marked as done (RFS: zodbpickle/0.6.0-1 [ITP])

2017-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:20:04 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: zodbpickle/0.6.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #847608, regarding RFS: zodbpickle/0.6.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#833193: RFS: chapel/1.15-1 [ITP]

2017-04-28 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 -moreinfo control: retitle -1 RFS: chapel/1.15-1 [ITP] Dear Ben, On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:48:00PM +, Ben Albrecht wrote: > Thanks for your feedback. Below are: > * some responses to your questions > * a description of some major changes recently incorporated in the >

Bug#861368: RFS: helm/2.5.0-2 [Team Upload]

2017-04-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Gianfranco, On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:47:13AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > in deferred/2, so Sean can review changes if needed :) Thanks for uploading -- could you reschedule an extra 2 or 3 days please? I am currently moving house. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description:

Bug#833193: closed by Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> (Closing inactive ITP RFSs)

2017-04-28 Thread Ben Albrecht
Hi Sean, Thanks for your feedback. Below are: * some responses to your questions * a description of some major changes recently incorporated in the package * some questions about the long-term plans of a fully featured (non-minimal) Chapel package. Note that we have upgraded our

Bug#858538: fadecut package review

2017-04-28 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Marco, bash consiedered to be an "essential" package, so you should probably not depend on it. It should be in the system. I do not understand, what you mean with "killed my orbis-tools|lame rule". As far as I see, dependencies were just aligned. Debian is deeply frozen at the moment, but

Bug#861406: RFS: udfclient/0.8.8-1

2017-04-28 Thread Pali Rohár
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient" * Package name: udfclient Version : 0.8.8-1 Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk * URL : http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/ *

xf86-input-tslib: new upstream release (and location)

2017-04-28 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Hi all, xf86-input-tslib is kind of dying in Debian, see https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xf86-input-tslib tslib itself that this driver uses, has quite some users still. Now there is a new release, version 0.0.7 of this Xorg driver at a new location:

Bug#861394: RFS: wcc/20170424-1 [ITP] -- a collection of compilation tools to perform binary black magic on the GNU/Linux and other

2017-04-28 Thread Philippe Thierry
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wcc" * Package name: wcc Version : 20170424-1 Upstream Author : Jonathan Brossard * URL : https://github.com/endrazine/wcc * License : MIT

Re: Bug#861281: rnahybrid: FTBFS on armel

2017-04-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:23:20AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > > rnahybrid FTBFS on armel: > > > the warning above is somewhat important > (too many nested loops), and this usually relates badly with > high optimization levels >... The warning is about an off-by-one in the

Bug#861371: sponsorship-requests: Looking for sponsorship for libgdamm package

2017-04-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
last thing: there seems to be already an Ubuntu package, so for sure you should start from that packaging. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgdamm5.0 G.

Bug#861371: sponsorship-requests: Looking for sponsorship for libgdamm package

2017-04-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgdamm the package as is is a no-no. lots of useless stuff in packaging, incomplete copyright, wrong VCS-Git field (and missing repo), debhelper 9 instead of 10, missing package description, rules file that should be fixed

Bug#861352: RFS: dhelp/0.6.23 [QA] -- online help system

2017-04-28 Thread Коля Гурьев
28.04.2017 08:52, Gianfranco Costamagna пишет: well, with apache2 installed, the whole package is not working http://localhost/doc/HTML/index.html I think you have to configure it, this is why I thought it was a problem on my apache installation and not on your package. Removing apache2 makes