Bug#867158: RFS: weresync/1.0.7-1 [ITP]

2017-07-17 Thread Daniel Manila
Another update mainly to math upstream version. There should be no functional difference in package performance. Some language files were moved in order to better work with Python's packaging system. You can download the new package here:

Install documentation for a library to the library's documentation directory

2017-07-17 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy all, How should I make library documentation available at a single obvious location, for any of several binary packages of the library? I am working on a package with the following dependencies:: Source: pyfoo Package: python3-foo Section: python Suggests: python-foo-doc

Re: How to make a shared lib recognized by debhelpers?

2017-07-17 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
What does file(1) return for this file? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

How to make a shared lib recognized by debhelpers?

2017-07-17 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi, I am currently adopting plplot [1], which included a simplification and modernization of the build system (using modern debhelpers). I now have the problem, that one of the shared libraries is probably not detected correctly: "lintian" tells me E: octave-plplot: unstripped-binary-or-object

Bug#860496: marked as done (RFS: drgeo/1.1.0-10.3 [NMU, RC])

2017-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:11:35 -0700 with message-id <20170717181135.4ohj7ekiiil2q...@iris.silentflame.com> and subject line Closing inactive RFS has caused the Debian Bug report #860496, regarding RFS: drgeo/1.1.0-10.3 [NMU, RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#851937: marked as done (RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP)

2017-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:04:49 -0700 with message-id <20170717180449.ewwrpalhxrbue...@iris.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#851937: RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #851937, regarding RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP to be marked as done. This

Bug#868088: marked as done (RFS: sysbench/1.0.8+ds-1 -- multi-threaded benchmark tool for database systems)

2017-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:51:53 -0700 with message-id <20170717175153.esrqib57vs44y...@iris.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#868088: RFS: sysbench/1.0.8+ds-1 -- multi-threaded benchmark tool for database systems has caused the Debian Bug report #868088, regarding RFS:

Bug#868668: RFS: parsedatetime/2.4-2

2017-07-17 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: parsedatetime   Version : 2.4-2   Upstream Author : Mike Taylor * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/parsedatetime * License :

Bug#845710: marked as done (RFS: mongovi/1.0.0-1 [ITP])

2017-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:20:28 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: mongovi/1.0.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #845710, regarding RFS: mongovi/1.0.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#851937: RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP

2017-07-17 Thread Paride Legovini
control: tag -1 -moreinfo On 2017-07-15 02:28, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Here is a review of 534d41f: Thank you for reviewing it. > - I think we should list Dmitry in the Uploaders: field Done > - your git history does not really give credit to Dmitry for his work. > I'd like to suggest

Bug#868088: RFS: sysbench/1.0.8+ds-1 -- multi-threaded benchmark tool for database systems

2017-07-17 Thread JCF Ploemen
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 16:01:25 -0700 Sean Whitton wrote: > Could you explain the need for this change, please? Perhaps directly > in the changelog. > > Also, you need to run `dch -r` -- the changelog timestamp is behind > changes you've made.