Another update mainly to math upstream version. There should be no
functional difference in package performance. Some language files were
moved in order to better work with Python's packaging system.
You can download the new package here:
Howdy all,
How should I make library documentation available at a single obvious
location, for any of several binary packages of the library?
I am working on a package with the following dependencies::
Source: pyfoo
Package: python3-foo
Section: python
Suggests: python-foo-doc
What does file(1) return for this file?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I am currently adopting plplot [1], which included a simplification and
modernization of the build system (using modern debhelpers).
I now have the problem, that one of the shared libraries is probably not
detected correctly: "lintian" tells me
E: octave-plplot: unstripped-binary-or-object
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:11:35 -0700
with message-id <20170717181135.4ohj7ekiiil2q...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive RFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #860496,
regarding RFS: drgeo/1.1.0-10.3 [NMU, RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:04:49 -0700
with message-id <20170717180449.ewwrpalhxrbue...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#851937: RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #851937,
regarding RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:51:53 -0700
with message-id <20170717175153.esrqib57vs44y...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#868088: RFS: sysbench/1.0.8+ds-1 -- multi-threaded
benchmark tool for database systems
has caused the Debian Bug report #868088,
regarding RFS:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:
* Package name: parsedatetime
Version : 2.4-2
Upstream Author : Mike Taylor
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/parsedatetime
* License :
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:20:28 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: mongovi/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #845710,
regarding RFS: mongovi/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On 2017-07-15 02:28, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Here is a review of 534d41f:
Thank you for reviewing it.
> - I think we should list Dmitry in the Uploaders: field
Done
> - your git history does not really give credit to Dmitry for his work.
> I'd like to suggest
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 16:01:25 -0700
Sean Whitton wrote:
> Could you explain the need for this change, please? Perhaps directly
> in the changelog.
>
> Also, you need to run `dch -r` -- the changelog timestamp is behind
> changes you've made.
11 matches
Mail list logo