Bug#870125:

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses" * Package name: lua-moses Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-1 Upstream Author : Yonaba * URL :http://yonaba.github.io/Moses/ * License :

Bug#864737: marked as done (RFS: cid/9.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sun, 30 Jul 2017 04:20:10 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: cid/9.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #864737, regarding RFS: cid/9.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#868544: Debian Bug #868544: RFS (dtksettings) Rejected

X-Debbugs-CC: czc...@debian.org felixonm...@archlinux.org 在 2017年7月29日星期六 CST 下午6:08:37，Gianfranco Costamagna 写道： > Seems to have been rejected > > G. Ack. The package is rejected since pkg-deepin does not exist (yet) on Alioth. Here is the plan: * Poke Alioth admins on IRC #alioth and

Bug#870100: marked as done (RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.1-1)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Jul 2017 22:54:39 +0200 with message-id <20170729205439.jjlhj4w25ldzn...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#870100: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #870100, regarding RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1

On the git server you can find a new commit with all the changes requested. 2017-07-29 19:34 GMT+02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin : > * The package now depends on python3 > Which package? It's both a build dependency and a runtime dependency of "cyclograph" the main binary package. The

Bug#870100: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid": * Package name: hoteldruid Version : 2.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis * URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com * License : AGPLv3

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:08:52PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote: > > And there are other changes (about python for example) that are not listed > > in the changelog. > I listed all the changes done to files in the "debian" folder. The > other changes are > all made by upstream and, in my

Bug#868544: closing 868544

Seems to have been rejected G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#867009: RFS: fzf/0.16.8-2 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, Thank you for the feedback. > The initial upload should have the debian revision of -1. The latest revision is revision 1.[0] > Please update to the current Standards-Version. The latest revision uses Standards-Version 4.0.0, though mentors.debian.net does not recognise 4.0.0,

Bug#866123: RFS: fbkeyboard/0.1-1 [ITP]

Please update to the current Standards-Version. Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. You don't need DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS and /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk. The upstream build system ignores CPPFLAGS. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#867009: RFS: fzf/0.16.8-2 [ITP]

The initial upload should have the debian revision of -1. Please update to the current Standards-Version. Please use the priority optional. The .dsc file is wrong: "dpkg-source: error: file ./fzf_0.16.8.orig.tar.gz has size 128895 instead of expected 128889". -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc

Bug#864944: RFS: zimg/2.5.1-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Please update to the current Standards-Version. Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. ${shlibs:Depends} for libzimg-examples does nothing and there is a warning about that in the build log. Files: src/* doc/* test/* m4/* * should be replaced with just Files:

Re: Bug#869198: RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 07:44:59AM -0400, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Andreas Moog wrote: > > > To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > > I suggest mailing the bug instead, since debian-mentors is subscribed > to all RFS bugs but RFS bug submitters might be only subscribed

Bug#858155: RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP]

Also, usually the License blocks are put after the Files blocks in d/copyright. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#858155: RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! The project license is GPL-2 while debian/copyright says GPL-2+. Please update to the current Standards-Version. Please switch tot he debhelper compat level 10. Otherwise the package seems good. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Bug#869198: RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Andreas Moog wrote: > To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org I suggest mailing the bug instead, since debian-mentors is subscribed to all RFS bugs but RFS bug submitters might be only subscribed to their RFS bugs. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Bug#867145: RFS: fancon/0.11.13

On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 05:35:15PM +1000, Hayden Briese wrote: I'm not a DD, so can't sponsor your package. Here are some comments: > * Package name: fancon > Version : 0.11.13 > Upstream Author : Hayden Briese (haydenbri...@gmail.com) > * URL :

Bug#870042: RFS: gsettings-qt/0.1+16.04.20170729-1 [ITP]

Hi, I'm not uploading it myself, but there are various things that ought to be fixed: a) qtchooser is not needed in Build-Depends, it's an "implementation detail" b) we don't use a "qtdeclarative5-" prefix for QML modules, but "qml-module-" c) seen while building: dpkg-gencontrol:

Bug#870042: RFS: gsettings-qt/0.1+16.04.20170729-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: czc...@debian.org debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gsettings-qt". * Package name: gsettings-qt Version : 0.1+16.04.20170729-1 Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.

Re: Bug#869198: RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 02:19:20PM +0200, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote: I'm not a DD so can't sponsor your package. Here is a comment: > * Package name: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir Your watch-file seems to be not working: $ uscan --report uscan warn: unrecognised option \\ uscan warn: