Bug#872147: marked as done (RFS: lirc/0.10.0-2)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Aug 2017 04:39:01 + (UTC) with message-id <1722144433.4221437.1502944741...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#872147: RFS: lirc/0.10.0-2 NMU has caused the Debian Bug report #872147, regarding RFS: lirc/0.10.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#870242: marked as done (RFS: woeusb/2.1.2+-1 (ITP) -- Bootable Windows installation/PE USB storage creator)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:51:23 +0500 with message-id <20170816185123.6tga4in6653ii...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#870242: RFS: woeusb/2.1.2+-1 (ITP) -- Bootable Windows installation/PE USB storage creator has caused the Debian Bug report #870242, regarding RFS:

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 01:00:21PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > > > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >= 2.28.0. > > > > > > > > > > Fixing. > > You've changed it to >= 2.25-5. Why? Also, why this restriction is needed? > > > > I don't know what the guidance is for

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

Thank you for the feedback and for the effort it takes to review these packages. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:05:26PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >=

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:05:26PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >= 2.28.0. > > > > Fixing. You've changed it to >= 2.25-5. Why? Also, why this restriction is needed? I've run license-reconcile on the package, it shows a lot of

Bug#872358: RFS/ITP: node-is-module/1.0.0-1

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > * URL : https://github.com/component/is-module 404 -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#872358: RFS/ITP: node-is-module/1.0.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-is-module" * Package name: node-is-module Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Jonathan Ong * URL : https://github.com/component/is-module * License

Bug#872340: RFS: golang-github-dlclark-regexp2/1.1.6-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-dlclark-regexp2" * Package name: golang-github-dlclark-regexp2 Version : 1.1.6-1 Upstream Author : Douglas Clark * URL

Bug#872060: marked as done (RFS: gnome-recipes/1.6.2-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:22:57 -0400 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: gnome-recipes/1.6.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #872060, regarding RFS: gnome-recipes/1.6.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done.

Bug#872329: RFS/ITP: node-rollup-plugin-commonjs/8.1.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-rollup-plugin-commonjs" * Package name: node-rollup-plugin-commonjs Version : 8.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Rich Harris * URL :

Bug#869198: RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP]

Hello Andreas, > Your watch-file seems to be not working: thanks for noticing, and for taking the trouble to re-send the mail to the BTS as I did indeed miss the one on the mailing list! The "debian/watch" file was generated by "dh-make-golang" automatically, but it seems to have incorrect

Bug#872147: RFS: lirc/0.10.0-2 NMU

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:41:10AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > > > They was fixed by the experimental 0l.10.0-rc3 upstream release, which > > > eventually became 0.10.0 by upstream and pushed to sid as 0.10.0-1. This > > > should have been mentioned in -1, but was not, hence the -1 note. > > If

Bug#872320: RFS: golang-github-dop251-goja/0.0~git20170430.0.d382686-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-dop251-goja" * Package name: golang-github-dop251-goja Version : 0.0~git20170430.0.d382686-2 Upstream Author : Dmitry Panov * URL

Bug#870621: closing 870621

close 870621 thanks Sponsored by szlin@. Thanks! Regards, Boyuan Yang

Bug#872147: RFS: lirc/0.10.0-2 NMU

On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 02:01:12 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:32:55PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > > > Why does the report title say "NMU"? > > > > Perhaps it shouldn't - large parts of the debian workflow is still a mystery > > for me. > Please