Re: No idea how to fix abs arguments in nanopolish

Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > to fix bug #853568 I tried a patch (gcc-7.patch) to fix abs() arguments > in nanopolish[1] but I have no idea how to deal with this: > > ... > g++ -o src/hmm/nanopolish_pore_model_set.o -c -g -O2 > -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/nanopolish-0.5.0=.

Bug#861617: Fwd: Re: Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings

Should have been sent to the entire list. Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:41:21 -0400 From: Sanford Rockowitz Organization: Minaret Software To:

No idea how to fix abs arguments in nanopolish

Hi, to fix bug #853568 I tried a patch (gcc-7.patch) to fix abs() arguments in nanopolish[1] but I have no idea how to deal with this: ... g++ -o src/hmm/nanopolish_pore_model_set.o -c -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/nanopolish-0.5.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security

Bug#873822: RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hallo David, The package is already in a nice state; many thanks for updating it! However some fixes are required: - d/copyright needs fixing: - as it says "Copyright: ?"... I think it must be Copyright: 2000 Matthew Danish

Bug#867270: ITA: babl/0.1.28-4

Ping?

Bug#873744: marked as done (RFS: liboauth/1.0.3-1 [QA])

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:31:48 +0200 with message-id <1504211508.16239.0.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#873744: RFS: liboauth/1.0.3-1 [QA-upload] has caused the Debian Bug report #873744, regarding RFS: liboauth/1.0.3-1 [QA] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#873858: marked as done (RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-10)

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2017 20:42:02 +0200 with message-id <20170831184202.s2ahfg4czz5rl...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#873858: RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #873858, regarding RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#873858: RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-10

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmalloc" * Package name: dmalloc Version : 5.5.2-10 Upstream Author : Gray Watson * URL : http://dmalloc.com/ * License

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Please upgrade to the current Standards-Version. Why do you use "rm `find . -name "*.la"`" instead of "find . -name "*.la" -delete"? Why do you ship static versions of the plugins? README_PACKAGERS says "It is recommended to run ldconfig in %post and %postun to add/remove the /oprofile path from

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 23:52:48 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:45:56PM -0300, Roberto Oliveira wrote: > > > I still see a lot of old junk in debian/control: > > > - did you write that Build-Depends? if no, please write them from scratch, > >

Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash/4.3.2493-1 [ITP] -- IBM Data Engine for NoSQL Software Libraries

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo src/build/install/resources/{cap,ptd}.gz are prebuilt binaries too. If you remove them too, and are sure there is no other such things, you may change the package bacn to main from non-free. cxlffdc won't work on Debian properly, I suspect there are other things like

Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:38:44PM -0400, Sanford Rockowitz wrote: > I assume you mean replace the dummy "Packaged for debian-mentors > submission." entry and update the timestamp. Yes, and as I've said, and lintian have told you, you should have done it at the very beginning. > Can you give

Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings

I assume you mean replace the dummy "Packaged for debian-mentors submission." entry and update the timestamp. Can you give some guidance as to what should be in the initial changelog entry? Thanks. Sanford On 08/31/2017 12:22 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Please fix the changelog entry

Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings

Please fix the changelog entry and I'll upload this. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings

A new version of ddcutil has been uploaded to mentors. Comments interspersed. On 08/31/2017 06:58 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: You should build your packages on sid and test them on sid. After executing pdebuild on sid for distribution sid, messages unchanged: $ lintian -EI --pedantic

Bug#873822: RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "achilles" * Package name: achilles Version : 2-9 Upstream Author : Matthew Danish * URL : http://achilles.sourceforge.net/ * License

Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:43:45AM -0400, Sanford Rockowitz wrote: > > Please run lintian (with -EI --pedantic and against the binary .changes) > > and review its output. > After executing pdebuild on buster for distribution buster You should build your packages on sid and test them on sid. > W:

Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings

An updated copy of ddcutil has been uploaded to mentors reflecting Andrey's review. Comments interspersed. On 08/20/2017 12:02 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: The package FTBFS: dh_install dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "/usr/bin" (tried in ., debian/tmp) dh_install: ddcutil