Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:
* Package name: flake8-docstrings
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Simon Andre and Ian Cordasco
* URL : https://gitlab.com/pycqa/flake8-docstrings
Please keep 868...@bugs.debian.org in To: or CC: so there's a record of
review done and that others can chime in too.
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:24:43PM +0200, Baptiste Pouget wrote:
> Thank you for your help !
> I now have fixed the issues you mentionned.
> Is there any issue left or is my
Your message dated Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:06:05 +0200
with message-id <1504386365.10828.11.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#873822: RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #873822,
regarding RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
> Please update Standards-Version to he current version.
Done.
This triggers a warning in lintian, which only knows about 4.0.0
This warning is displayed also by other packages already in Debian and
nobody put in place an override for this warning so I though I should do
the same.
Debian policy
libopagent.so should be in -dev.
I think /etc/ld.so.conf.d/oprofile-jit.conf should be in oprofile-jit.
I think you had a .symbols file for libopagent1, you should use it again.
You should use debian/tmp instead of . in find commands in d/rules.
Your .html files are size 0, because you haven't
Your message dated Sat, 02 Sep 2017 16:44:28 +0100
with message-id <1504367068.7360.6.ca...@kathenas.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: evolution/3.22.6-1.1 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #872022,
regarding RFS: evolution/3.22.6-1.1 [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Am 2. September 2017 15:37:59 MESZ schrieb Carlos Maddela :
>This bug should have been marked done, as it already has been uploaded
>by Tobias Frost. I'm not opposed to adopting the package.
>
That's great! Just prepare another upload for the adoption and I'll sponsor it
Am 2. September 2017 15:35:14 MESZ schrieb roucaries bastien
:
>It is a huge changelog for a qa upload.
QA uploads are not limited in terms of changes. Contraire it should fix as much
as possible. Adopting is great but not required.
--
Diese Nachricht
Your message dated Sat, 2 Sep 2017 15:20:21 + (UTC)
with message-id <1672165425.2536737.1504365621...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#872645: Subject: RFS: diodon/1.6.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #872645,
regarding RFS: diodon/1.6.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 03:35:14PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
> I means that I will
> prefer that carlos maddela will become the maint of this package.
>
> It is a huge changelog for a qa upload.
Oh, I see what you mean now.
Well, I understand your point, even if I don't deem it necessary
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 03:23:46PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> I can sponsor but I will need to be the maintainer of this package not
>> debian-qa
>
> ?
> *you* will need to be the maintainer? That doesn't make
This bug should have been marked done, as it already has been uploaded
by Tobias Frost. I'm not opposed to adopting the package.
On 02/09/17 23:29, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 03:23:46PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> I can sponsor but I will need to be the maintainer of
Hi Andrey,
I found something wrong in the last version I sent, so I just sent a
new version.
So in case you already did a "dget -x", please, do it again.
Regards,
Roberto Oliveira.
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 03:23:46PM +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
> I can sponsor but I will need to be the maintainer of this package not
> debian-qa
?
*you* will need to be the maintainer? That doesn't make sense for QA
upload.
BTW, QA uploads do keep Debian QA as maintainer, see
I can sponsor but I will need to be the maintainer of this package not debian-qa
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Carlos Maddela wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liboauth"
>
> *
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 01:18:17AM +0200, Baptiste Pouget wrote:
> * Package name: sokochez
>Version : 0.6.2-1
>Upstream Author : Baptiste Pouget
> * URL : https://github.com/Sokochez/sokochez
> * License : GPLv3
>Section : games
>
> It
On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 06:08:10PM +0700, Arnaud wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> > On the other hand, an upload with two new changelog entries, while mildly
> > unrecommended, is fine -- but it's good to remind the uploader that he or
> > she needs to manually specify "-v0.7-1" when repacking the source as
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:43:54PM -0400, Marc Ferland wrote:
> > Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
Not fixed.
> > Please update Standards-Version to the current version.
Not fixed.
Please remove unneeded comments and sample lines from d/rules.
uscan says "Newest version of libzc
Hi Adam,
> * New upstream release.
> - - Remove deprecated gnome-common macros/variables. Closes: #929881.
> + - Remove deprecated gnome-common macros/variables. Closes: #829881.
> - Resize icons in menu. Closes: #816124.
> * Remove manual page (now shipped by upstream).
> * Bump Gtk+ required
Hello,
Thanks for having a look at it.
I uploaded a new version of the package on mentors
https://mentors.debian.net/package/clickhouse
The respective dsc file can be found at:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clickhouse/clickhouse_1.1.54284-1.dsc
My answer inline
On 28/07/2017
Hallo David,
Am Freitag, den 01.09.2017, 23:31 +0100 schrieb David William Richmond
Davies-Jones:
> It was with compat level 10.
I cannot reproduce it here, weaked d/control to just have
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), libpng-dev, libsdl1.2-dev
Please upload your package to mentors and I will
21 matches
Mail list logo