Reviewed by Diane Trout:
* The copyright file looks correct.
* The source tree matches what I downloaded
* The one patch removes a network request.
* Lintian warnings are just missing gpg signature and upstream
changelog
* I built the package and installed it, and ran it in emacs.
I had trouble
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 12:11:57PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
Man thanks Boyuan for taking care about goldendict!
> Dear mentors and Dmitry,
>
>* Add myself into uploaders list. (Hijacking package)
As I learned on DebConf17'S we've have a (proposed) process for
this. Lets bring it to live
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: un...@debian.org
Dear mentors and Dmitry,
I am looking for a sponsor for Dmitry's package "goldendict". This would be an
NMU and I would like to see it into DELAYED/7. Detailed explanations at
bottom.
* Package name:
Your message dated Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: gsignond/1.0.6-1 [ITP] -- gSSO daemon and default
plugins
has caused the Debian Bug report #860123,
regarding RFS: gsignond/1.0.6-1 [ITP] -- gSSO daemon and
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 00:45:00 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:55PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> > >> * Non-maintainer upload
> > > If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA?
> > > And why are you doing this NMU? Please read
> > >
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:55PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> >> * Non-maintainer upload
> > If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA?
> > And why are you doing this NMU? Please read
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
> > for valid NMU
>>Version : 1.17-1+nmu1
> The version suffix is wrong.
Fixed
>> * Non-maintainer upload
> If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA?
> And why are you doing this NMU? Please read
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
> for valid NMU reasons
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:42:29 +0500
with message-id <20170905154229.ewdgzr4o54kcr...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor
settings
has caused the Debian Bug report #861617,
regarding RFS: ddcutil/0.8.4-1 [ITP] - control
Hi Andrey,
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 22:44:24 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> libopagent.so should be in -dev.
Fixed.
> I think /etc/ld.so.conf.d/oprofile-jit.conf should be in oprofile-jit.
Fixed.
> I think you had a .symbols file for libopagent1, you should use it again.
Fixed.
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 04:37:00PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote:
>Version : 1.17-1+nmu1
The version suffix is wrong.
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> vnstat (1.17-1+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer upload
If it's a NMU why
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:34:38 +0200
with message-id <20170905143438.5bsn5voxvrwlt...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#874348: RFS: splint/1:3.1.2+dfsg-1 [QA-upload]
has caused the Debian Bug report #874348,
regarding RFS: splint/1:3.1.2+dfsg-1 [QA-upload]
to be marked as done.
Package: sponsorship-requests
X-Debbugs-CC: fge...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vnstat"
* Package name: vnstat
Version : 1.17-1+nmu1
Upstream Author : Teemu Toivola
* URL : http://humdi.net/vnstat/
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "splint"
* Package name: splint
Version : 1:3.1.2+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : University of Virginia
* URL : http://www.splint.org/
* License
13 matches
Mail list logo