Bug#861772: marked as done (RFS: writeroom-mode/3.6.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:20:15 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: writeroom-mode/3.6.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #861772, regarding RFS: writeroom-mode/3.6.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#877047: marked as done (RFS: sane-backends-extras/1.0.22.5 [QA])

Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:20:10 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sane-backends-extras/1.0.22.5 [QA] has caused the Debian Bug report #877047, regarding RFS: sane-backends-extras/1.0.22.5 [QA] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#867727: marked as done (RFS: parlatype/1.5.2-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:04:40 +0200 with message-id <6bc3b267-1a78-a581-5b48-0117daa81...@the-gammons.net> and subject line Re: Bug#867727: RFS: parlatype/1.5.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #867727, regarding RFS: parlatype/1.5.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#877047: RFS: sane-backends-extras/1.0.22.5 [QA]

Hi Hugh McMaster, > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sane-backends-extras". > > * Package name: sane-backends-extras >Version: 1.0.22.5 >Upstream Author: SANE > * URL: http://www.sane-project.org/ > *

Bug#861772: RFS: writeroom-mode/3.6.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:54:46AM -0400, Antoine Beaupre wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:47:00AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > > > Tagging as moreinfo while investigating a potential trademark > > infringement issue. I will untag when this has been

Doubt about using a forked version for a new package release

Hi! I would like to have some opinions and suggestions about the best action when updating a package that has a forked version. The forked version is better updated, maintained and has improvements over the original version. Debian has pngnq at version 1.0 with the latest upstream version at 1.1

Re: Bug#877047: RFS: sane-backends-extras/1.0.22.5 [QA]

Hi Hugh McMaster, > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sane-backends-extras". I can review this RFS. I did the last QA upload. Regards, Herbert > > * Package name: sane-backends-extras >Version: 1.0.22.5 >

Bug#861772: RFS: writeroom-mode/3.6.1-1 [ITP]

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:47:00AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > Tagging as moreinfo while investigating a potential trademark > infringement issue. I will untag when this has been resolved. Any update here? Can you clarify the trademark issue and what's

Bug#867727: RFS: parlatype/1.5.2-1 [ITP]

Ross Gammon schrieb am 2017-09-24 um 21:03: The only thing I spotted, was the lack of a docbase file to help people fire up the docs locally: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.html#doc-base Done. Added the doc-base file and put a symlink from

Bug#877057: RFS: python-bayespy/0.5.11-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: python-bayespy Version : 0.5.11-1 Upstream Author : Jaakko Luttinen * URL : https://www.bayespy.org * License

Bug#861490: update

quick update: I package it already, I'd only need a sponsor. The package is on mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/xf86-input-tslib I maintain the tslib package aswell. It gains popularity now: