Bug#869664: marked as done (RFS: ptpython/0.39~20170703-1 [ITP])

2017-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Oct 2017 05:15:31 + with message-id and subject line Closing. has caused the Debian Bug report #869664, regarding RFS: ptpython/0.39~20170703-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

source package ready, lintian remark Bug - #859130 ITP: lina -- iso- Forth interpreter

2017-10-08 Thread Albert van der Horst
L.S. At last I have a debian archive for lina that is generated using proper procedures (debhelper, quilt etc.) from the (upstream) source package: https://github.com/albertvanderhorst/ciforth/release/dsc (I goofed with the description, it should be "proper" not "official") There is a pgp si

Bug#872753: marked as done (RFS: node-regjsparser/0.2.1+ds-1 [ITP])

2017-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Oct 2017 16:20:35 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: node-regjsparser/0.2.1+ds-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #872753, regarding RFS: node-regjsparser/0.2.1+ds-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#876476: marked as done (RFS: spyder/3.2.3+dfsg1-1)

2017-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Oct 2017 10:20:23 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: spyder/3.2.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #876476, regarding RFS: spyder/3.2.3+dfsg1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#877974: RFS: extsmail/2.0-2.1 [NMU, RC]

2017-10-08 Thread Andreas Moog
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a nmu of the package "extsmail". Please upload to DELAYED/7 to give the maintainer time to react to the patch. * Package name: extsmail Version : 2.0-2.1 Section : mail It b