Bug#882730: marked as done (RFS: wolfssl/3.12.2+dfsg-1 [requires NEW] -- wolfSSL encryption library)

2017-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:35:49 +0900 with message-id <1511768149.2023924.1185138808.72a26...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: RFS: wolfssl/3.12.2+dfsg-1 [requires NEW] -- wolfSSL encryption library has caused the Debian Bug report #882730, regarding RFS:

Re: orphaned open-cobol package should be replaced with new gnucobol package

2017-11-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Simon Sobisch wrote: > I'd like to know if there's something the GnuCOBOL project can do to > allow the orphaned open-cobol package to be replaced with a new gnucobol > package and provide updates for it. I would suggest starting with the existing open-cobol

Bug#882780: Bug #882780: RFS: extrace/0.4-1 [ITP]

2017-11-26 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:01:10PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 882569 by -1 > > The source and (amd64) binary packages can be found on my webserver: > > https://nicolas.braud-santoni.eu/tmp/deb/ The package is also

Bug#882817: RFS: cligh/0.3-2 [ITA] -- Command-line interface to GitHub

2017-11-26 Thread eamanu15 .
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cligh" * Package name: cligh Version : 0.3-2 * URL : https://github.com/eamanu/cligh * License : Copyright (c) 2010 Christopher M. Brannon This upload

Bug#882816: RFS: snooze/0.2-1 [ITP]

2017-11-26 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 882814 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "snooze" * Package name: snooze Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen * URL :

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] C++ help needed for centrifuge

2017-11-26 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Le 27/11/2017 à 00:39, Alexis Murzeau a écrit : > Hi, > > Le 26/11/2017 à 22:01, Fabian Klötzl a écrit : >> Ho, >> >> On 26.11.2017 19:32, Walter Landry wrote: >>> Andreas Tille wrote: Unfortunately I've hit another issue: ... classifier.h:428:54: error: the

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] C++ help needed for centrifuge

2017-11-26 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Hi, Le 26/11/2017 à 22:01, Fabian Klötzl a écrit : > Ho, > > On 26.11.2017 19:32, Walter Landry wrote: >> Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Unfortunately I've hit another issue: >>> >>> ... >>> classifier.h:428:54: error: the value of 'rank' is not usable in a constant >>> expression

Bug#882812: RFS: quickcal/1.0 ITP

2017-11-26 Thread Nathan SR
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quickcal" * Package name: quickcal Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : * URL : https://mentors.debian.net/package/quickcal * License : GPL

Bug#882810: RFS: jag/0.3.3-1 [ITP] -- arcade-puzzle 2D game in which you have to break all the target pieces

2017-11-26 Thread Carlos Donizete Froes
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jag" * Package name: jag Version : 0.3.3-1 Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes * URL : https://github.com/coringao/jag * License

Bug#882642: marked as done (RFS: quickcal/1.0 ITP)

2017-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2017 22:20:06 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: quickcal/1.0 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #882642, regarding RFS: quickcal/1.0 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#882798: RFS: mblaze/0.2-1 [ITP]

2017-11-26 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 882793 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "holes" * Package name: holes Version : 0~git.20170801.13d2aac9-1 Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen * URL :

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] C++ help needed for centrifuge

2017-11-26 Thread Fabian Klötzl
Ho, On 26.11.2017 19:32, Walter Landry wrote: > Andreas Tille wrote: >> Unfortunately I've hit another issue: >> >> ... >> classifier.h:428:54: error: the value of 'rank' is not usable in a constant >> expression >> while((uint8_t)_hitMap[i].rank < rank) {

Bug#882791: Bug #882791: RFS: mblaze/0.2-1 [ITP]

2017-11-26 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 09:37:02PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > The source package can be found on mentors.debian.org: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/mblaze I rebuilt the package (due to having forgotten to include the full text of the CC0 license in debian/copyright), but

Bug#882791: RFS: mblaze/0.2-1 [ITP]

2017-11-26 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 882788 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mblaze" * Package name: mblaze Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen * URL :

Re: How to get debian ci test passed for proxy application

2017-11-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 18:42:22 +, James Cowgill wrote: > > My local test shows all pass, while debian ci test [1] shows a > > connection timeout message. > > So I'm wondering whether debian ci support network activity, and how > > can I configure the test to get it passed. > I think you might

Bug#882780: RFS: extrace/0.4-1 [ITP]

2017-11-26 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 882569 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "extrace" * Package name: extrace Version : 0.4-1 Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen * URL :

Bug#882332: marked as done (RFS: mistune/0.8.1-1)

2017-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2017 19:49:43 +0100 with message-id <20171126184943.vyozvexgxupck...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#882332: RFS: mistune/0.8.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #882332, regarding RFS: mistune/0.8.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: How to get debian ci test passed for proxy application

2017-11-26 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On 26/11/17 17:00, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Dear mentors list, > > I maintain a proxy application, shadowsocks-libev. > I want to let it pass debian ci test. And I already confirm the test > all passed on my local environment, and debomatic [0]. > However it failed on debian ci infrastructure

Re: C++ help needed for centrifuge

2017-11-26 Thread Walter Landry
Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 01:39:03PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: >> > In file included from centrifuge_build.cpp:27:0: >> > bt2_idx.h: In static member function 'static std::pair> > Ebwt*> Ebwt::fromStrings(const >> >

How to get debian ci test passed for proxy application

2017-11-26 Thread Roger Shimizu
Dear mentors list, I maintain a proxy application, shadowsocks-libev. I want to let it pass debian ci test. And I already confirm the test all passed on my local environment, and debomatic [0]. However it failed on debian ci infrastructure [1]. [0]

orphaned open-cobol package should be replaced with new gnucobol package

2017-11-26 Thread Simon Sobisch
The last mention of the open-cobol package I've found was on https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/08/msg00071.html where it was mentioned as being orphaned. The open-cobol package includes OpenCOBOL 1.1 from February 2009. OpenCOBOL was renamed to GnuCOBOL when accepted as GNU project. The

Re: How to determine the filename for dlopen()

2017-11-26 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Guillem Jover writes: > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 13:23:01 +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > >> I'm packaging a program which wants to dlopen() some library. It finds >> this library via pkg-config (PKG_CHECK_MODULES). How to best determine >> the filename to use in the dlopen()

Re: C++ help needed for centrifuge

2017-11-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 01:39:03PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: > > In file included from centrifuge_build.cpp:27:0: > > bt2_idx.h: In static member function 'static std::pair > Ebwt*> Ebwt::fromStrings(const > > EList&, bool, int, int, bool, > >

Bug#849754: RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.0-1

2017-11-26 Thread halfdog
Hello Mentors, While the package in question (see [0]) is working 24/7 on multiple machines without problems, having created and transfered about 10k of data elements so far, also surviving updates, reboots, both the inclusion process but also the purging of obsolete RFS seems stuck. Should