Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnubik"
* Package name: gnubik
Version : 2.4.3-2
Upstream Author : John Mark Darrington
* URL : http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnubik/
* License : GPL-3+
Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 05:20:08 +0100
with message-id <20180102042008.za6ppakhbw6jf...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#885717: RFS: tilde/0.3.9-1 [ITP] -- Intuitive text
editor for the terminal
has caused the Debian Bug report #885717,
regarding RFS: tilde/0.3.9-1 [ITP] -- Intuiti
Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 05:12:48 +0100
with message-id <20180102041248.xa22qw77cstgx...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#885714: RFS: libt3widget/0.5.4-1 [ITP] -- C++ terminal
dialog toolkit
has caused the Debian Bug report #885714,
regarding RFS: libt3widget/0.5.4-1 [ITP] -- C++ te
Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 04:52:08 +0100
with message-id <20180102035208.rzgsiv3s5bpp2...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#885715: RFS: libt3highlight/0.4.5-1 [ITP] -- Syntax
highlighting library
has caused the Debian Bug report #885715,
regarding RFS: libt3highlight/0.4.5-1 [ITP] --
Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 04:10:50 +0100
with message-id <20180102031050.bo5k62rizzh4a...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#885710: RFS: libt3key/0.2.7-1 ITP #885595
has caused the Debian Bug report #885710,
regarding RFS: libt3key/0.2.7-1 ITP #885595
to be marked as done.
This means t
On 31 Dec 2017, Andrew Shadura wrote:
>On 30 December 2017 at 15:08, Gabriel F. T. Gomes
> wrote:
>>
>> 2. Even though I read the discussions about salsa on debian-devel, I
>> still do not know how to name the repository. When browsing the
>> projects under the Debian group, I got the impression
Your message dated Mon, 1 Jan 2018 23:58:35 +0100
with message-id <20180101225835.k7mrzyto6c4dh...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#885979: RFS: kcheckers/0.8.1-4 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #885979,
regarding RFS: kcheckers/0.8.1-4 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Mon, 01 Jan 2018 22:32:32 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: libt3window/0.2.6-1 [ITP] -- Library for creating
window-based terminal programs
has caused the Debian Bug report #885711,
regarding RFS: libt3window/0.2.6-1 [ITP] -- Library for creating window-based
Em 01-01-2018 14:02, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:47:26AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>> On 2018-01-01 at 10:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best can be done
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:47:26AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-01-01 at 10:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> >> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best can be done
> >> by who wants to do the job.
> >
> > So your
Em 01-01-2018 13:39, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best
>> can be done by who wants to do the job.
>
> So your argument is "the package is not developed anymore (?) and was
> always li
On 2018-01-01 at 10:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
>> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best can be done
>> by who wants to do the job.
>
> So your argument is "the package is not developed anymore (?) and
> was alway
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best
> can be done by who wants to do the job.
So your argument is "the package is not developed anymore (?) and was
always like that, so let's not touch it too much"?
> I honestly
Em 01-01-2018 12:06, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 11:01:59AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> It is impossible that someone has both - duc and duc-nox - installed ?
>
> Using the alternatives system you can have both installed, and the the
> system administrator decides what p
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 11:01:59AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> It is impossible that someone has both - duc and duc-nox - installed ?
Using the alternatives system you can have both installed, and the the
system administrator decides what provides /usr/bin/duc (but by default
keep it the -x var
Em 01-01-2018 10:56, The Wanderer escreveu:
> On 2018-01-01 at 05:48, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
>>
>>> Well said, I agree 100%.
>>>
>>> I consider both parties to be wrong here:
>>> * Jonathan went very hasty on the NMU
>>> * Herbert refuses a patch for a quite annoying thing, fixing which requires
On 2018-01-01 at 05:48, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
>> Well said, I agree 100%.
>>
>> I consider both parties to be wrong here:
>> * Jonathan went very hasty on the NMU
>> * Herbert refuses a patch for a quite annoying thing, fixing which requires
>> no effort on his side (as the submitter did all
> Well said, I agree 100%.
>
> I consider both parties to be wrong here:
> * Jonathan went very hasty on the NMU
> * Herbert refuses a patch for a quite annoying thing, fixing which requires
> no effort on his side (as the submitter did all the work), without
> providing any rationale
>
> It
18 matches
Mail list logo
