Bug#886760: RFS: tl-cpputils/1.0-1 [ITP]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:54:47PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > * Package name: tl-cpputils > Version : 1.0-1 > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tl-cpputils/tl-cpputils_1.0-1.dsc Builds only on amd64, other archs fail due to symbol problems. It's up to you to

Bug#887048: marked as done (RFS: iptux/0.7.0-1)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Jan 2018 06:12:16 +0100 with message-id <20180113051215.khhgwqqvgcrs5...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#887048: RFS: iptux/0.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #887048, regarding RFS: iptux/0.7.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#887048: RFS: iptux/0.7.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: chinese-develop...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors and chinese-developers folks, I am looking for a sponsor for team package "iptux" * Package name: iptux Version : 0.7.0-1 Upstream Author : LI Daobing

Bug#887040: RFS: reptyr/0.6.2-1.1 [RC] [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "reptyr" * Package name: reptyr Version : 0.6.2-1.1 Upstream Author : Evan Broder * URL : https://github.com/nelhage/reptyr * License

Bug#879881: closed by Jonathan Carter <jonat...@aims.ac.za> (Uploading package)

Hi Jonathan, On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 07:15:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: > > #879881: RFS: olivetti-mode/1.5.9-1 [ITP] > > It has been closed by Jonathan

Bug#887013: marked as done (RFS: z80dasm/1.1.5-1 -- disassembler for the Zilog Z80 microprocessor)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:33:47 +0100 with message-id <20180112173347.bbmebxc575p4p...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#887013: RFS: z80dasm/1.1.5-1 -- disassembler for the Zilog Z80 microprocessor has caused the Debian Bug report #887013, regarding RFS: z80dasm/1.1.5-1 --

Bug#864174: marked as done (RFS: wallpaperdownloader/2.7-1 [ITP] -- Download wallpapers from the Internet and more)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:31:54 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: wallpaperdownloader/2.7-1 [ITP] -- Download wallpapers from the Internet and more has caused the Debian Bug report #864174, regarding RFS:

Bug#886501: marked as done (RFS: qwt/6.1.3-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable])

Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:26:56 +0100 with message-id <7eb4343e-07e4-7c1c-00bd-d7d01b566...@xs4all.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#886501: RFS: qwt/6.1.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #886501, regarding RFS: qwt/6.1.3-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] to be marked as done.

Bug#887013: RFS: z80dasm/1.1.5-1 -- disassembler for the Zilog Z80 microprocessor

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "z80dasm": Package name: z80dasm Version : 1.1.5-1 Upstream Author : Tomaž Šolc (tomaz.s...@tablix.org) URL : https://www.tablix.org/~avian/blog/articles/z80dasm/

Bug#886597: closing 886597

close 886597 thanks Sponsored by aron@. Thanks! Regards, Boyuan Yang

Bug#886774: marked as done (RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.5.4)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:15:04 +0100 with message-id <20180112131504.hb7wc7ygaset4...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#886774: RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.5.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #886774, regarding RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.5.4 to be marked as done. This means

Re: r-cran-git2r uses private header files of libgit2 (Was: Help with libgit2 needed to strip code copy from r-cran-git2r)

Hi Dirk, On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:51:45AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > I had some friendly emails with Stefan (git2r upstream) when he started the R > package git2r (as I needed some features in my drat R package) and he > expressed quite some frustration at working with libgit2 as it

Re: Taking over a package from an active DD

Am 11. Januar 2018 15:06:13 MEZ schrieb Mattia Rizzolo : >On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:26:23PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote: >> I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package >> and offering to take over the maintenance. To date I have no answer. >> >> What can I do?

Bug#886501: RFS: qwt/6.1.3-1

Hi Bas I did apply the changes to the rules file but I built the package and made changes to the symbols file according to the pkd-kde symbols instructions instead of using your patch. I added back the Qt4 support according to our offline discussions. Will remove it when all reverse dependencies