Bug#898655: marked as done (RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-4 [RC])

Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 22:19:01 +0200 with message-id <20180523201901.uewmlunpolu2f...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#898655: RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-4 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #898655, regarding RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-4 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#899188: marked as done (RFS: urlwatch/2.11-1)

Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 21:34:03 +0200 with message-id <20180523193403.6jtqxfgoyojvl...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#899188: RFS: urlwatch/2.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #899188, regarding RFS: urlwatch/2.11-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#898975: marked as done (RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-2)

Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 21:27:52 +0200 with message-id <20180523192752.sdamjtbdwoaoi...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#898975: RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #898975, regarding RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-2 to be marked as done. This

Bug#897964: marked as done (RFS: uriparser/0.8.5-1)

Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 21:21:15 +0200 with message-id <20180523192115.crbcvappgdx2r...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#897964: RFS: uriparser/0.8.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #897964, regarding RFS: uriparser/0.8.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Hello, I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n. 2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov : > I will make my next upload use alternatives, thank you. This upload uses alternatives to select ODP library to be used. >> * move all the executables to

Bug#867731: marked as done (RFS: smart-mode-line/2.11.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 16:30:07 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: smart-mode-line/2.11.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #867731, regarding RFS: smart-mode-line/2.11.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Problem with lintian error symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision

Hi Andreas, On 05/23/2018 12:11 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a symbols file for libseqlib version 1.1.1+dfsg since I > suspected an ABI change by upstream. A test build with this symbols > file went fine without lintian errors. I upgraded to libseqlib version > 1.1.2 which

Bug#898551: marked as done (RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20180125-1)

Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 12:08:39 +0200 with message-id <20180523100839.rd54aauw3qp6o...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#898551: RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20180125-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #898551, regarding RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20180125-1 to be marked as done. This means

Problem with lintian error symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision

Hi, I've created a symbols file for libseqlib version 1.1.1+dfsg since I suspected an ABI change by upstream. A test build with this symbols file went fine without lintian errors. I upgraded to libseqlib version 1.1.2 which in fact had an ABI change[2]. I have upgraded the symbols file

Bug#867731: RFS: smart-mode-line/2.11.0-1 [ITP]

tags 867731 + pending thanks Nicholas, > If you have time, would you please sponsor this one too? Done. > […] FYI, there is really no need for lengthy explanations, descriptions of the changes and your history with the package here. Indeed, please redirect that effort — if any — into putting

Bug#899347: RFS: golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify/0.9.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: close 895197 Control: block 895173 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify" * Package name: golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify