Re: debian/copyright and po files

2018-06-18 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Ben, Apologies for the delayed response. On Saturday, 16 June 2018 11:09 AM, Ben Finney wrote: > Whether a person's creative work is restricted by copyright law, is a > matter less for Debian project members and more for experts in copyright > law. > > So your question could be intepreted in m

Bug#897238: marked as done (RFS: intel-mkl/2018.2.199-1 [ITP])

2018-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:47:53 + with message-id <20180618154753.GA2699@Asuna> and subject line Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- In NEW has caused the Debian Bug report #897238, regarding RFS: intel-mkl/2018.2.199-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: Salsa repository request

2018-06-18 Thread Fabian Wolff
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 07:02:15PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > I see a few problems here; some I need you to address before moving > forward, and others can be tackled later. Let me make a list: > > 1) You're basically removing functionalities from the upstream project, > so I think you

Re: Salsa repository request

2018-06-18 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Monday, June 18 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 07:02:15PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> I see a few problems here; some I need you to address before moving >> forward, and others can be tackled later. Let me make a list: >> >> 1) You're basically removing functio

Bug#899175: marked as done (RFS: mini-httpd-run/1.0 ITP)

2018-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jun 2018 23:39:25 +0300 with message-id <20180618203925.ga16...@mitya57.me> and subject line Re: Bug#899175: RFS: mini-httpd-run/1.0 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #899175, regarding RFS: mini-httpd-run/1.0 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t