Bug#907838: RFS: 2 pkgs once part of emacs-goodies-el: bm-el/201808-1, mutt-alias-el/1.5-1

2018-09-02 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors and Chris, This is a joint RFS for two packages that were previously part of emacs-goodies-el: bm-el/201808-1, and mutt-alias-el/1.5-1. The Debian Emacsen team is 96% done transitioning emacs-goodies-el to a dummy transitional package,

Bug#907803: closed by Adam Borowski (Re: Bug#907803: RFS: udfclient/0.8.9-1)

2018-09-02 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:37:43PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 02 September 2018 21:33:03 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Nitpick: these warnings are trivial to fix: > > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-2-clause > > (paragraph at line 37) > > W:

Bug#907773: closed by Sven Hoexter (Re: Bug#907773: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-3)

2018-09-02 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:03:16AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 03:10:32PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Ho Nicholas, > > > btrfsmaintenance (0.4.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > * Import

Bug#907803: closed by Adam Borowski (Re: Bug#907803: RFS: udfclient/0.8.9-1)

2018-09-02 Thread Pali Rohár
On Sunday 02 September 2018 21:33:03 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Nitpick: these warnings are trivial to fix: > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-2-clause > (paragraph at line 37) > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-2-clause >

Bug#907803: marked as done (RFS: udfclient/0.8.9-1)

2018-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2018 23:29:23 +0200 with message-id <20180902212923.zjvneeh6aqlus...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#907803: RFS: udfclient/0.8.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #907803, regarding RFS: udfclient/0.8.9-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#907833: marked as done (RFS: minidb/2.0.2-3)

2018-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2018 23:22:12 +0200 with message-id <20180902212212.ufpegnkdidhi5...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#907833: RFS: minidb/2.0.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #907833, regarding RFS: minidb/2.0.2-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#907192: pre-RFS: tensorflow/1.10.0+dfsg-A1 [ITP] -- debian archve += 1 million lines of code

2018-09-02 Thread Lumin
Some updates about this pre-RFS: Summary: 1. The README.Debian file is totally invalidated. Please don't review the repo. 2. I switched to use python plus ninja for building Debian's TF, which may have a chance to evolve into the final solution. On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 22:58 Lumin wrote:

Bug#907797: marked as done (RFS: urlwatch/2.14-1)

2018-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2018 16:20:30 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: urlwatch/2.14-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #907797, regarding RFS: urlwatch/2.14-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#907809: RFS: svg-labels/0.3.0-1 [ITP]

2018-09-02 Thread Miroslav Kravec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "svg-labels": * Package name: svg-labels Version : 0.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Miroslav Kravec * URL : https://github.com/kravemir/svg-labels * License

Bug#907803: RFS: udfclient/0.8.9-1

2018-09-02 Thread Pali Rohár
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient" * Package name: udfclient Version : 0.8.9-1 Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk * URL : http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/ * License :

Bug#907773: marked as done (RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-3)

2018-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2018 12:56:42 +0200 with message-id <20180902105642.ga1...@timegate.de> and subject line Re: Bug#907773: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #907773, regarding RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#907797: RFS: urlwatch/2.14-1

2018-09-02 Thread Maxime Werlen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "urlwatch" * Package name: urlwatch Version : 2.14-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Perl * URL : https://thp.io/2008/urlwatch/ * License : BSD-3-clause

Re: Formal definitions of Provides and Replaces

2018-09-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Andrius Merkys wrote: > I fail to find the formal definitions (regarding API/ABI and files) of > Provides and Replaces fields of d/control, could someone point it out to me > please? In particular, if package A Provides/Replaces B, does that mean that > A MUST have

How to package Berkeley Packet Filters

2018-09-02 Thread Gregor Jasny
Hello Debian Mentors, I'm writing because I seek advice on how to properly package Berkeley Packet Filter objects. I was not able to find prior art in any other Debian package. The v4l-utils source package contains a program called ir-keytable which could be used to alter in-kernel infrared

Formal definitions of Provides and Replaces

2018-09-02 Thread Andrius Merkys
Dear Mentors, I fail to find the formal definitions (regarding API/ABI and files) of Provides and Replaces fields of d/control, could someone point it out to me please? In particular, if package A Provides/Replaces B, does that mean that A MUST have the same API/ABI and files as B? Many thanks,