Your message dated Sat, 12 Jan 2019 04:25:21 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: monitorix/3.10.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #918958,
regarding RFS: monitorix/3.10.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 11 Jan 2019 22:20:37 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: arptables/0.0.4+snapshot20181021-3 - ARP table
administration
has caused the Debian Bug report #919013,
regarding RFS: arptables/0.0.4+snapshot20181021-3 - ARP table administration
to be marked as
Control: owner -1 Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Hi Baptiste,
Le 11/01/2019 à 00:13, Baptiste BEAUPLAT a écrit :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "monitorix"
>
> * Package name: monitorix
>Version :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package "tintin++"
* Package name: tintin++
Version : 2.01.5-1
Upstream Author : Igor van den Hoven
* URL : http://tintin.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arptables"
* Package name: arptables
Version : 0.0.4+snapshot20181021-3
Upstream Author : Bart De Schuymer
* URL : http://www.netfilter.org
* License
On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:42:43 +0200,
Andreas Tille wrote:
> The values of the structure are set in line 350[3] and are OK there.
What looks suspicious to me is that an unsigned long long value is
assigned to struct members of type size_t. In the previous upstream
release that worked, the return
6 matches
Mail list logo
