Bug#919865: marked as done (RFS: scdoc/1.6.0-1)

2019-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:24:50 +0100 with message-id <20190121002450.zgz4h55qws64w...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#919865: RFS: scdoc/1.6.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #919865, regarding RFS: scdoc/1.6.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#919743: RFS: rumur/2019.01.12-1 [ITP]

2019-01-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 12:15:54PM -0800, Matthew Fernandez wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2019, at 17:29, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 06:43:13PM -0800, Matthew Fernandez wrote: > >> * Package name: rumur > >> Version : 2019.01.12-1 > > The package fails to build: >

Bug#919819: Remember to close bug #799710

2019-01-20 Thread Mario Stephan
Hi Juhani, It's a pity that 2.3.0-3 was not used. I even have the knowthelist_2.3.0-3_amd64.mentors.upload file on my disk. Nevertheless I changed the changelog (removed the 2.3.0-3 item and moved the left line to the current change set) now. The new upload is done. Thanks Mario On So,

Bug#919743: RFS: rumur/2019.01.12-1 [ITP]

2019-01-20 Thread Matthew Fernandez
> On Jan 19, 2019, at 17:29, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 06:43:13PM -0800, Matthew Fernandez wrote: >> * Package name: rumur >> Version : 2019.01.12-1 > >> dget -x >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rumur/rumur_2019.01.12-1.dsc > >> Changes

Bug#917629: RFS: xhk/1.0-1

2019-01-20 Thread Kieran Bingham
Hi Dmitry, On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, 19:36 Dmitry Bogatov > [2019-01-04 12:29] Kentaro Hayashi > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 02:17:57 +0100 Adam Borowski > wrote: > > > Am I holding it wrong? > > > > step 1. launch xhk > > step 2. press "j" key, then "j" is typed > > step 3. press space and "j" key, then

Bug#919819: Remember to close bug #799710

2019-01-20 Thread Juhani Numminen
found 799710 2.3.0-2 stop Hi Mario, While version 2.3.0-3 of knowthelist was never uploaded, it still appears in the changelog which might be a bit misleading. Also the bug #799710 may be left accidentally open, because by default, only the topmost changelog entry contributes to automatical

Re: RFS: ethereal-chess/11.00+ds1-1 [ITP]

2019-01-20 Thread Jose G. López
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 10:42:10 +0100 "Jose G. López" wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ethereal-chess": > > ethereal-chess (11.00+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Initial release (Closes: #914598)

Bug#919916: RFS: eggdrop/1.8.4-1

2019-01-20 Thread Cédric Barboiron
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eggdrop" * Package name : eggdrop Version : 1.8.4-1 Upstream Author : Eggheads Development Team * URL : https://www.eggheads.org/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary

Bug#917629: RFS: xhk/1.0-1

2019-01-20 Thread Kentaro Hayashi
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 19:34:45 + Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > [2019-01-04 12:29] Kentaro Hayashi > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 02:17:57 +0100 Adam Borowski wrote: > > > Am I holding it wrong? > > > > step 1. launch xhk > > step 2. press "j" key, then "j" is typed > > step 3. press space and "j" key,

Bug#917629: RFS: xhk/1.0-1

2019-01-20 Thread Kentaro Hayashi
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:29:54 +0900 Kentaro Hayashi wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 02:17:57 +0100 Adam Borowski wrote: > > The packaging seems all fine. > > Thank you for reviewing. > > > The man page is corrupted -- I see a few ANSI codes among the troffage, > > the text seems doubled and

Bug#919819: RFS: knowthelist/2.3.1

2019-01-20 Thread Mario Stephan
New link ist: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/knowthelist/knowthelist_2.3.1-1.dsc On So, Jan 20, 2019 at 2:51 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: Hi Adam, thanks for your fast feedback. To be honest, this was the easiest way for me to get rid of some confusing warnings /

Bug#919819: RFS: knowthelist/2.3.1

2019-01-20 Thread Adam Borowski
Hi Adam, thanks for your fast feedback. To be honest, this was the easiest way for me to get rid of some confusing warnings / errors of the build tools. But your arguments sounds reasonable and I tried to re-build the package as quilt. New upload is done. I look forward to further feedback

Bug#877331: sponsorship-requests: nix/1.1.15 (ITP 877019) -- Purely functional package manager

2019-01-20 Thread Kai Harries
Hi, itd writes: > Hi, > > Kai Harries: >> The depender will break if the dependency is not at the path where it >> used to be at build-time (by default /nix/store/...). All software >> deployed by nix contains the full path to its dependencies. And all >> dependencies are available inside the

Bug#919865: RFS: scdoc/1.6.0-1

2019-01-20 Thread Birger Schacht
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scdoc" * Package name : scdoc Version : 1.6.0-1 Upstream Author : Drew DeVault * Url : https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/scdoc * Licenses : MIT