Hi Nicholas,
> No one has responded to this RFS since it was filed 12 Jan. Would you
> please sponsor and review this NEW package
Sure. python-css-parser_1.0.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
Control: severity -1 important
Hello,
Paolo Greppi, le lun. 04 févr. 2019 00:59:40 +0100, a ecrit:
> Package: hwloc
> Version: 1.11.12-1
> Severity: serious
>
> I tested your package against a draft package for doxygen 1.8.15:
> https://bugs.debian.org/919413
This is not serious yet, until it
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:57 PM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:15 PM Paul Wise wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for your suggestions. I think I have finally finished making
> > > the package. However, the final step
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 7:15 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your suggestions. I think I have finally finished making
> > the package. However, the final step debuild -us -uc fails
> > with an error message stating that the
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> I'm hoping someone can help me co-maintain it or help me get this
> package accepted. For your information I am a high school CS teacher
> in Canada who uses python fltk to teach gui programming. It's a lot
> easier to tell my students to
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:03 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestions. I think I have finally finished making
> the package. However, the final step debuild -us -uc fails
> with an error message stating that the source package has two
> conflicting values: pyfltk and
Thank you for your suggestions. I think I have finally finished making
the package. However, the final step debuild -us -uc fails
with an error message stating that the source package has two
conflicting values: pyfltk and python3-fltk.
I have uploaded the package source to
BTW, I retried uhd and actually it does not fail.
So I created 9 new bugs:
hwloc: https://bugs.debian.org/921293
fltk1.3: https://bugs.debian.org/921294
wcslib: https://bugs.debian.org/921295
ccfits: https://bugs.debian.org/921296
qevercloud: https://bugs.debian.org/921297
libstxxl:
Hi Chris,
No one has responded to this RFS since it was filed 12 Jan. Would you
please sponsor and review this NEW package if late 2018 firmware
support for various ebook readers is important for Buster? It is a
required dep for updating Calibre. Links follow below:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 06:24:42PM -0700, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> Justification: new required dep for Calibre
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-css-parser". It
> will be maintained on the Debian Python
I ran ratt, 31 of 729 packages genuinely FTBFS due to doxygen 1.8.15.
More details here:
https://salsa.debian.org/paolog-guest/doxygen/wikis/ratt-job-for-doxygen-1.8.15
All these failures are related to an issue with texlive-base 2018.20190126-1:
https://bugs.debian.org/920621
and ultimately due
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 11:43:43AM +, Gabriele wrote:
> * Package name: austin
> Version : 0.6.1~beta-1
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/austin/austin_0.6.1~beta-1.dsc
> austin (0.6.1~beta-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Initial release (Closes:
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2019 21:53:10 +0100
with message-id <20190203205310.tvgqngiazn4ry...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#921260: RFS: lebiniou/3.30-1 -- displays images that
evolve with sound
has caused the Debian Bug report #921260,
regarding RFS: lebiniou/3.30-1 -- displays
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2019 20:15:31 +0100
with message-id <20190203191531.57s3ph6aefhjv...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#921250: RFS: scdoc/1.8.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #921250,
regarding RFS: scdoc/1.8.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lebiniou":
* Package name: lebiniou
Version : 3.30-1
Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel
* URL : https://biniou.net
* License : GPL-2+
Section
Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2019 18:12:04 +0100
with message-id <20190203181204.2a0c1c36c9aeb104f89df...@paranoici.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.28
has caused the Debian Bug report #921228,
regarding RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.28
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scdoc"
* Package name : scdoc
Version : 1.8.1-1
Upstream Author : Drew DeVault
* Url : https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/scdoc
* Licenses : MIT
[2019-02-01 10:46] Thomas Ward
> >> Dear mentors,
> >> [...]
> >> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> >>
> >> dget -x
> >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/imaplibext/imaplibext
> >> _0.7.6-1.dsc
Never wrap links, no matter how long they
[2019-02-02 00:51] Dmitry Shachnev
> Hi Dmitry!
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 04:12:53AM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > Looks fine, but I do not understand following line in `debian/rules':
> >
> > rm -rfv debian/python3-github/usr/lib/python3.*
> >
> > What is removed and why same
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello!
Since I have received one late translation update, I thought I could
prepare a new version of the apt-listbugs package (0.1.28):
it is ready to be uploaded to Debian sid.
Could someone please build the package from commit
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "austin"
* Package name: austin
Version : 0.6.1~beta-1
Upstream Author : Gabriele N. Tornetta
* URL : https://github.com/P403n1x87/austin
* License :
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 4:02 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> which conserves the main important parts of history without any
> hassle to deal with archived svn.
This will drop commit messages and any changes that weren't uploaded.
Personally, I never found dealing with local subversion databases any
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:48:38PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> of the repository to git and continue from there. You can also skip
> the conversion and just checkout the latest svn revision and continue
> from there.
May be its easier and in the end more sensible to create a Git archive
via
23 matches
Mail list logo
