Bug#927738: RFS: scdoc/1.9.4-1

2019-04-22 Thread Birger Schacht
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scdoc" * Package name : scdoc Version : 1.9.4-1 Upstream Author : Drew DeVault * Url : https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/scdoc * Licenses : MIT Programming

Bug#927738: marked as done (RFS: scdoc/1.9.4-1)

2019-04-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:17:20 +0200 with message-id <20190422091720.ga14...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#927738: RFS: scdoc/1.9.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #927738, regarding RFS: scdoc/1.9.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#927283: RFS: lebiniou/3.31-1 -- displays images that evolve with sound

2019-04-22 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-04-18 13:21] Olivier Girondel > On 4/18/19 12:24 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > Looks fine. Are you sure you want to upload into unstable now, during > > freeze? It may cause inconvenience should need to fix RC bug in > > previous version arise. > > Hi Dmitry, > No problem, this can wait.

Bug#927363: RFS: urlwatch/2.17-1

2019-04-22 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-04-18 15:30] Maxime Werlen > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "urlwatch" > > * Package name: urlwatch >Version : 2.17-1 >Upstream Author : Thomas Perl > * URL : https://thp.io/2008/urlwatch/ > * License : BSD-3-clause >Section

Bug#927743: RFS: lablie/0.6.0-1 [ITP]

2019-04-22 Thread Miroslav Kravec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lablie": * Package name: lablie Version : 0.6.0-1 Upstream Author : Miroslav Kravec * URL : https://gitlab.com/kravemir/lablie https://kravem

Bug#925911: RFS: lopsub-1.0.2 [ITP]

2019-04-22 Thread Andre Noll
On Sun, Apr 21, 22:25, Adam Borowski wrote > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Andre Noll wrote: > > That's just because I misread section 8.1 of the Debian Policy Manual. > > I've renamed the -dev package to liblopsub-dev. > > Not sure if you'd want the _source_ package to have a simple s