Re: micro-httpd package removed from sources.debian.org

2019-07-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 7:25 AM Leonardo Perez Pulido wrote: > What does it mean that a package has been removed from sources.debian.org? It just means there is no web-based view of the Debian source package. The Debian source package is still available in the Debian apt repository. In this case,

Re: micro-httpd package removed from sources.debian.org

2019-07-07 Thread Andrej Shadura
Hi, On Sun, 7 Jul 2019, 18:25 Leonardo Perez Pulido, < leoperezpul...@protonmail.com> wrote: > Recently I have started my journey has a prospective Debian maintainer. To > start with I have selected the micro-httpd [1] package, which have been > declared orphan and have no current maintainer [2].

micro-httpd package removed from sources.debian.org

2019-07-07 Thread Leonardo Perez Pulido
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear developers, Recently I have started my journey has a prospective Debian maintainer. To start with I have selected the micro-httpd [1] package, which have been declared orphan and have no current maintainer [2]. However, after Buster release th

Bug#931582: RFS: ddupdate/0.6.4-1

2019-07-07 Thread Alec Leamas
package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ddupdate" Package name: ddupdate Version : 0.6.4-1 Upstream Author : Alec Leamas leamas.alecgmail.com URL : https://github.com/leamas/ddupdate License

Bug#931395: RFS: gcc-doc-defaults/5:18 [RC]

2019-07-07 Thread Adam Borowski
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:45:18AM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > * Package name: gcc-doc-defaults > Version : 5:18 > Changes since the last upload: [...] > * Build gcc-8 docs (Closes: #905022) The package would become uninstallable for anyone

Bug#931576: marked as done (RFS: blackbox-themes/0.6)

2019-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 7 Jul 2019 21:46:16 +0200 with message-id <20190707194616.gb30...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#931576: RFS: blackbox-themes/0.6 has caused the Debian Bug report #931576, regarding RFS: blackbox-themes/0.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#931565: marked as done (RFS: pentobi/17.1-1)

2019-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 7 Jul 2019 21:41:32 +0200 with message-id <20190707194132.ga30...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#931565: RFS: pentobi/17.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #931565, regarding RFS: pentobi/17.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#931576: RFS: blackbox-themes/0.6

2019-07-07 Thread Juhani Numminen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "blackbox-themes" which I have orphaned (#931569). I don't have much interest in blackbox or its themes these days. Additionally, I took the chance to convert the old-style packaging to dh.

Bug#931565: RFS: pentobi/17.1-1

2019-07-07 Thread Juhani Numminen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi". Package name: pentobi Version : 17.1-1 Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger URL : https://pentobi.sourceforge.io License : GPLv3+ Section

Re: Importing a new upstream version

2019-07-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 07/07/2019 03:03, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 6:18 PM Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: What git repository are you running it in? It should be run in the packaging repository, not the upstream one. From the next post, it was being run in the right place. (The package'