Your message dated Thu, 1 Aug 2019 23:47:30 -0700
with message-id <20190802064730.ga1...@kiwi.nardis.ca>
and subject line Re: Bug#933507: RFS: openldap/2.4.48+dfsg-1~bpo10+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #933507,
regarding RFS: openldap/2.4.48+dfsg-1~bpo10+1
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Nico Schlömer wrote:
> I'm starting to package Stellar, a tet mesh optimizer [1].
> The package is very basic, but still things are failing. I don't know why.
> 1. The gitlab-ci build [2] fails with
> ```
> Checking cache for default...
> FATAL: file does not exist
> Failed to extract cache
> `
After a few attempts I upgraded the build system to the latest Debian 10
and now I got rid of all errors and many warnings. There are still a few
glitches, but I don't think they are too important. There's a newer
version of ffmpegfs, but I don't want to switch to it yet to avoid newer
bugs. Al
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 07:36:00PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote:
> El 1/8/19 a las 17:43, Adam Borowski escribió:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:57:51PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote:
> >> * Package name: multimail
> >>Version : 0.52-1
> > At a brief glance, the package seems ok, b
El 1/8/19 a las 17:43, Adam Borowski escribió:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:57:51PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote:
>> * Package name: multimail
>>Version : 0.52-1
>
>> Changes since the last upload:
>>
>> adjust patch and build version 0.52
>>
>> https://github.com/ftoledo/pk
Dear Mr. Paul W. By this means I want to thank you for your attention
towards me. I will begin to review the documentation you provided. I
hope that my contributions throughout my stay as a collaborator will be
very useful for this great project. Best regards. Eduardo Ponce.
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:57:51PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote:
> * Package name: multimail
>Version : 0.52-1
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> adjust patch and build version 0.52
>
> https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multimail/blob/master/debian/changelog
At a brief gla
Your message dated Thu, 01 Aug 2019 22:17:40 +0200
with message-id <85dbec21f4f6fdee46b09dd7fec9e79d657520a3.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#932717: RFS: blastem/0.6.3.2-2 -- Fast and accurate
Genesis emulator
has caused the Debian Bug report #932717,
regarding RFS: blastem/0.6.3.2-2 --
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Carlos,
there are not enough changes in the package that warrant an upload:
Changing compat level handling as only change is not enough…
However, there is bug #926498 … You probably want to fix that bug,
giving you the reason you need to justify an upload ;-)
--
tob
Your message dated Thu, 1 Aug 2019 21:54:50 +0200
with message-id <20190801195450.gc13...@coldtobi.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#932720: RFS: jag/0.3.5-5 -- arcade and puzzle 2D game
has caused the Debian Bug report #932720,
regarding RFS: jag/0.3.5-5 -- arcade and puzzle 2D game
to be marked as don
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:42:23PM -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> > I've took a look and I have to say assultcube's license is a nightmere;
> > for me it is far from clear from me what they mean… However, I cannot
> > see a change on the licensing, so I guess the situation is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multimail"
* Package name: multimail
Version : 0.52-1
Upstream Author : MultiMail was originally developed under Linux by
Kolossvary Tamas and Toth Istvan. John Zero was
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:43:20AM -0400, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > No idea about that but "gbp:error: Non-native package 'stellar' has
> invalid version '1.0'" is a valid problem.
>
> Fair enough. What does it mean? How to fix it?
It means that a non-native package must have a version that include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks Andrey for the reply.
> No idea about that but "gbp:error: Non-native package 'stellar' has
invalid version '1.0'" is a valid problem.
Fair enough. What does it mean? How to fix it?
> Have you ever built this package yourself? I'm sure the
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 03:00:14PM +0200, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> The package is very basic, but still things are failing. I don't know why.
Even though it's very basic it still contains at least two fatal problems
and some lesser ones.
> 1. The gitlab-ci build [2] fails with
> ```
> Checking cache
Hi everyone,
I'm starting to package Stellar, a tet mesh optimizer [1].
The package is very basic, but still things are failing. I don't know why.
1. The gitlab-ci build [2] fails with
```
Checking cache for default...
FATAL: file does not exist
Failed to extract cache
```
What does this mean?
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:17:12PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:14:05AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I have removed m4/ax_boost* in Git[1]. Unfortunately this leaded to
> > some configure errors. I was able to work around
> >
> > 1. error: possibly undefined macr
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:14:05AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have removed m4/ax_boost* in Git[1]. Unfortunately this leaded to
> some configure errors. I was able to work around
>
> 1. error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR
>
>by adding
>
> m4_pattern_a
Hi Helmut,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 08:12:34AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> aevol fails to cross build from source, because it ships a broken,
> outdated, embedded copy of AX_BOOST_BASE. The actual bug #872256 is
> already fixed for a while in autoconf-archive, but aevol happens to ship
> a copy o
Am 31.07.2019 um 09:46 teilte Frédéric Bonnard mit:
Hi Frédéric,
>> I sent a request 3 days ago, still no response. Do I have to sign my
>> E-Mail to get the request processed?
>
> No. It just takes a bit of time sometimes for people of the team that
> do this manually but they usually answer, s
20 matches
Mail list logo
