Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 06/08/2019: > > [2019-08-05 22:33] Paride Legovini >> Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 23/07/2019: >>> [2019-07-21 11:36] Paride Legovini > 1. In [942ed5e] you added this line: > > export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed >> [...] >> That's my understanding

Bug#932438: RFS: irqbalance/1.6.0-1 [ITA] -- Daemon to balance interrupts for SMP systems

[2019-08-05 22:33] Paride Legovini > Dmitry Bogatov wrote on 23/07/2019: > > [2019-07-21 11:36] Paride Legovini > >>> 1. In [942ed5e] you added this line: > >>> > >>> export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed > [...] > That's my understanding too. In this case I'm pretty sure the

Re: Sharing a script between two "Multi-Arch: foreign" packages

On 2019-08-06 16:45 +0200, Jens Reyer wrote: > Hi all, > > is there a way for two different, arch-specific packages (from the same > source package) to share an identical file (script)? Yes, provided one of these two packages diverts the other one's file, see dpkg-divert(1). This is usually

Bug#934002: marked as done (RFS: assaultcube-data/1.2.0.2.1-1 [ITA] -- data files and documentation for AssaultCube)

Your message dated Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:49:03 +0200 with message-id <8696ef18-10ad-9e6b-c75f-389db236c...@debian.org> and subject line Uploaded to debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #934002, regarding RFS: assaultcube-data/1.2.0.2.1-1 [ITA] -- data files and documentation for

Bug#934001: marked as done (RFS: assaultcube/1.2.0.2.1-1 [ITA] -- realistic first-person-shooter)

Your message dated Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:49:03 +0200 with message-id <8696ef18-10ad-9e6b-c75f-389db236c...@debian.org> and subject line Uploaded to debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #934001, regarding RFS: assaultcube/1.2.0.2.1-1 [ITA] -- realistic first-person-shooter to be marked as

Re: Sharing a script between two "Multi-Arch: foreign" packages

On 2019-08-06 16:45 +0200, Jens Reyer wrote: > Hi all, > > is there a way for two different, arch-specific packages (from the same > source package) to share an identical file (script)? Only if those two arch-specific packages have the same name - i.e. they are the 'same' package from dpkg's

Bug#934060: RFS: xpad/5.4.0-1 -- sticky note application for X

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for "xpad": Package name: xpad Version : 5.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Arthur Borsboom URL : https://launchpad.net/xpad License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It

Bug#934059: RFS: gevent-websocket/0.10.1-2 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gevent-websocket" * Package name: gevent-websocket Version : 0.10.1-2 Upstream Author : Jeffrey Gelens * URL : https://gitlab.com/noppo/gevent-websocket * License

Sharing a script between two "Multi-Arch: foreign" packages

Hi all, is there a way for two different, arch-specific packages (from the same source package) to share an identical file (script)? This works for "Multi-Arch: same" packages: $ dpkg -S /usr/share/doc/libwine/changelog.Debian.gz libwine:i386, libwine:amd64:

Bug#934058: RFS: onedrivesdk/1.1.8-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "onedrivesdk" * Package name: onedrivesdk Version : 1.1.8 Upstream Author : Microsoft * URL : https://pypi.org/project/onedrivesdk/ * License : MIT

Bug#934057: RFS: hipercontracer/1.4.4-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hipercontracer ": * Package name: hipercontracer Version: 1.4.4-1 Upstream Author: Thomas Dreibholz mailto:dre...@iem.uni-due.de>> *

Bug#934056: RFS: python-netsnmpagent/0.6.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-netsnmpagent" * Package name: netsnmpagent Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Pieter Hollants * URL : https://github.com/pief/python-netsnmpagent *

Bug#934054: RFS: fastentrypoints/0.12-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fastentrypoints" * Package name: fastentrypoints Version : 0.12 Upstream Author : Aaron Christianson * URL : https://github.com/ninjaaron/fast-entry_points *

Bug#934053: RFS: fwlogwatch/1.4-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fwlogwatch" It builds those binary packages: fwlogwatch - Firewall log analyzer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

Bug#934049: Subject: RFS: sctplib/1.0.22-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sctplib ": * Package name: sctplib Version: 1.0.22-1 Upstream Author: Thomas Dreibholz mailto:dre...@iem.uni-due.de>> * URL:

Bug#934029: RFS: ima-evm-utils/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ima-evm-utils" * Package name: ima-evm-utils Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Kasatkin , Mimi Zohar * URL :

Fwd: ITP Mmg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > There seems to be no license text in the file. Usually one has both a license statement and a license paragraph, listing the license text. For example: Alright, thank you! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: FlowCrypt 6.9.3 Gmail Encryption

Re: ITP Mmg

Hi Nico, >>From the linitian hints, there's one I don't understand: > ``` > missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright lgpl (paragraph at line 6) > ``` > None of `LGPL`, `LGPL-3+`, `LGPL-3-or-later` works. What am I missing here? There seems to be no license text in the file. Usually one has

Re: ITP Mmg

Thanks Mo for the hints. >From the linitian hints, there's one I don't understand: ``` missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright lgpl (paragraph at line 6) ``` None of `LGPL`, `LGPL-3+`, `LGPL-3-or-later` works. What am I missing here? Cheers, Nico On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:33 AM Mo Zhou

Bug#934022: RFS: bitwise/0.33-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bitwise" * Package name: bitwise Version : 0.33-1 Upstream Author : Ramon Fried * URL :