[j...@debian.org: Your Debian package(s) will not migrate to testing]

2019-09-05 Thread Andre Noll
Hi Adam, looks like tfortune needs a new source-only upload to migrate to testing. Could you please do this for me? Here's the commands to build the source package: git archive --prefix tfortune-1.0.0/ origin/master > ../tfortune_1.0.0.orig.tar.xz dpkg-buildpackage -S There hav

Re: [j...@debian.org: Your Debian package(s) will not migrate to testing]

2019-09-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 10:10:00AM +0200, Andre Noll wrote: > Hi Adam, > > looks like tfortune needs a new source-only upload to migrate to > testing. Could you please do this for me? Here's the commands to > build the source package: > > git archive --prefix tfortune-1.0.0/ origin/master

Re: [j...@debian.org: Your Debian package(s) will not migrate to testing]

2019-09-05 Thread Andre Noll
On Thu, Sep 05, 10:57, Julian Gilbey wrote > > There have been no changes since June, so your existing repo should > > still be uptodate. > > You will need to upload a new version, though; the system will not > accept a package with the same version number. I've released and tagged v1.0.1. Adam,

Re: [j...@debian.org: Your Debian package(s) will not migrate to testing]

2019-09-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 12:47:43PM +0200, Andre Noll wrote: > > > There have been no changes since June, so your existing repo should > > > still be uptodate. > > > > You will need to upload a new version, though; the system will not > > accept a package with the same version number. > > I've rel

Bug#935900: RFS: z3 4.8.4-0.1 [NMU]

2019-09-05 Thread Fabian Wolff
Great, thank you! Yes, I'm also hoping that the package will migrate quickly and smoothly. But the results so far (e. g. it builds on all release architectures) look promising! On 9/4/19 12:24 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > git was already correct, I sponsored it! > > lets hope it migrates

Re: [j...@debian.org: Your Debian package(s) will not migrate to testing]

2019-09-05 Thread Andre Noll
On Thu, Sep 05, 15:57, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 12:47:43PM +0200, Andre Noll wrote: > > > > There have been no changes since June, so your existing repo should > > > > still be uptodate. > > > > > > You will need to upload a new version, though; the system will not > > >

Bug#939490: RFS: ascii/3.18-2 -- interactive ASCII name and synonym chart

2019-09-05 Thread Calogero Lo Leggio
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ascii" * Package name : ascii Version : 3.18-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://www.catb.org/~esr/ascii/ * License : [fill in] * Vcs : https://salsa.debian

gbp buildpackage makes wrong orig.tar.gz

2019-09-05 Thread Yukiharu YABUKI
Hello, there. I am trying to solve the below problem. I use git buildpackage with cowbuilder. How can I chage top directory name of orig.tar.gz which made by gbp buildpackage. I would like change top diretory name to VOoM-5.3 from vim-voom_5.3. original: > tar ztvf vim-voom_5.3.orig.tar.gz > d

Re: gbp buildpackage makes wrong orig.tar.gz

2019-09-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 11:29:04PM +0900, Yukiharu YABUKI wrote: > Hello, there. > > I am trying to solve the below problem. I use git buildpackage with > cowbuilder. How can I chage top directory name of orig.tar.gz which > made by gbp buildpackage. > > I would like change top diretory name to V

Re: gbp buildpackage makes wrong orig.tar.gz

2019-09-05 Thread Yukiharu YABUKI
Hi The orig.tar.gz which has different size and contents will be REJECTED. I'd like to upload and accept the package. original tar.gz $ LANG=C;ls -la vim-voom_5.3.orig.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 yabuki yabuki 115841 Aug 14 2018 vim-voom_5.3.orig.tar.gz gbp buildpackage made: -rw-r--r-- 1 yabu

Re: gbp buildpackage makes wrong orig.tar.gz

2019-09-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:37:17AM +0900, Yukiharu YABUKI wrote: > The orig.tar.gz which has different size and contents will be > REJECTED. > > I'd like to upload and accept the package. So a typical XY problem. Just changing the top-level directory name is not enough to recreate the identical t

Bug#939509: RFS: lablie/0.6.1-1 -- CLI tool for printable labels generation from SVG templates

2019-09-05 Thread Miroslav Kravec
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lablie" * Package name: lablie Version : 0.6.1-1 * URL : https://gitlab.com/kravemir/lablie * License : Apache-2.0 * Vcs : https://salsa.debi