No "linux-all" architecture wildcard

2020-05-18 Thread Christoph Biedl
Hello, while packaging something that makes sense on Linux only, but one of the built packages is architecture-*in*dependent while depending on some of the linux-any ones - in other words, that arch-indep package makes no sense on non-linux ... The obivous way to declare architecture-all-but-linu

Bug#960940: RFS: runit/2.1.2-37 [RC] -- system-wide service supervision

2020-05-18 Thread Lorenzo Puliti
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit" * Package name: runit Version : 2.1.2-37 Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape * URL : http://smarden.org/runit/ * License : BSD-3-clause * Vcs

Re: No "linux-all" architecture wildcard

2020-05-18 Thread Niels Thykier
Christoph Biedl: > Hello, > > while packaging something that makes sense on Linux only, but one of the > built packages is architecture-*in*dependent while depending on some > of the linux-any ones - in other words, that arch-indep package makes > no sense on non-linux ... > > The obivous way to

Re: No "linux-all" architecture wildcard

2020-05-18 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 17:34 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > The obivous way to declare architecture-all-but-linux-only binary > packages was > > > Architecture: linux-all > > but there is no such architecture wildcard. That package isn't build, also > lintian emits an according warning. > >

Bug#960956: RFS: zhcon/1:0.2.6-17 -- Fast console CJK system using FrameBuffer (main program)

2020-05-18 Thread 铜豌豆 Linux
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zhcon" * Package name : zhcon Version : 1:0.2.6-17 Upstream Author : ejoy * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/zhcon/ * License : GPL-2.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/chinese-team/zh

Bug#959143: RFS: libgrokj2k/7.1.0-1 [ITP] -- JPEG 2000 image compression/decompression library

2020-05-18 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:24:18PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Hi Adam, > Thanks a lot for testing this I've fixed the build error - please try it > again when you have time. Hi! Sorry for the delay. There's one problem left: the .symbols file for libgrokj2k1 declares a dependency on libgrokj2k (

Bug#959143: RFS: libgrokj2k/7.1.0-1 [ITP] -- JPEG 2000 image compression/decompression library

2020-05-18 Thread Aaron Boxer
> > > Hi! > Sorry for the delay. > > There's one problem left: the .symbols file for libgrokj2k1 declares a > dependency on libgrokj2k (rather than 2k1). Please bump it a year ahead :) > Thanks! that was the last lintian warning :) All green now.

Re: No "linux-all" architecture wildcard

2020-05-18 Thread Christoph Biedl
Niels Thykier wrote... > Have you tried "linux-any", which would match "any" as the default > wildcard for any architecture specific binary package (vs. "all", which > really means "architecture independent")? Yes, that works - but it creates some 19 packages that are bitwise identical. Perhaps I

Bug#960940: RFS: runit/2.1.2-37 [RC] -- system-wide service supervision

2020-05-18 Thread David Kalnischkies
Hi, Disclaimer: Not sponsoring as I am oblivious to init systems of all kinds, so I don't feel confident reviewing changes in that area. (I am not stalking you – I promise! – I just couldn't let that opportunity pass by after pushing another set of apt resolver changes triggered by your package

Bug#960972: RFS: cellwriter/1.3.6-2 [QA] -- grid-entry handwriting input panel

2020-05-18 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cellwriter" * Package name: cellwriter Version : 1.3.6-2 Upstream Author : Michael Levin * URL : https://github.com/risujin/cellwriter * License : GPL

Re: No "linux-all" architecture wildcard

2020-05-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:43 PM Christoph Biedl wrote: > | Architecture: linux-all > > but there is no such architecture wildcard. You cannot make this an architecture wildcard, because wildcards resolve to real architectures in the .deb, which would still be Architecture: all, which means dak wo

Bug#960986: RFS: fortune-zh/2.96 [ITA] -- Chinese Data files for fortune

2020-05-18 Thread 铜豌豆 Linux
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh" * Package name : fortune-zh Version : 2.96 Upstream Author : xiao sheng wen * URL : [fill in URL of upstream's web site] * License : GPL-3.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/chin

Bug#960987: RFS: inkscape/1.0-1~bpo10+1 -- vector-based drawing program

2020-05-18 Thread Phil Wyett
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inkscape" * Package name: inkscape Version : 1.0-1~bpo10+1 Upstream Author : Too numerous to list, see website * URL : https://inkscape.org * License :

Bug#960987: RFS: inkscape/1.0-1~bpo10+1 -- vector-based drawing program

2020-05-18 Thread Ko Ko Ye`
same with https://packages.debian.org/sid/inkscape ?\ update or fix On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:00 AM Phil Wyett wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inkscape" > > * Package name: inkscape >Version

Bug#960987: RFS: inkscape/1.0-1~bpo10+1 -- vector-based drawing program

2020-05-18 Thread Phil Wyett
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 11:42 +0630, Ko Ko Ye` wrote: > same with > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/inkscape ?\ > > update or fix This is a backport from Debian testing with a couple of build fixes. Backports are only allowed from this distribution in most cases and for sid (unstable) very ra