On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 11:42 +0630, Ko Ko Ye` wrote:
> same with
>
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/inkscape ?\
>
> update or fix
This is a backport from Debian testing with a couple of build fixes.
Backports are only allowed from this distribution in most cases and for
sid (unstable) very ra
same with
https://packages.debian.org/sid/inkscape ?\
update or fix
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:00 AM Phil Wyett
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inkscape"
>
> * Package name: inkscape
>Version
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inkscape"
* Package name: inkscape
Version : 1.0-1~bpo10+1
Upstream Author : Too numerous to list, see website
* URL : https://inkscape.org
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh"
* Package name : fortune-zh
Version : 2.96
Upstream Author : xiao sheng wen
* URL : [fill in URL of upstream's web site]
* License : GPL-3.0+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/chin
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:43 PM Christoph Biedl wrote:
> | Architecture: linux-all
>
> but there is no such architecture wildcard.
You cannot make this an architecture wildcard, because wildcards
resolve to real architectures in the .deb, which would still be
Architecture: all, which means dak wo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cellwriter"
* Package name: cellwriter
Version : 1.3.6-2
Upstream Author : Michael Levin
* URL : https://github.com/risujin/cellwriter
* License : GPL
Hi,
Disclaimer: Not sponsoring as I am oblivious to init systems of all
kinds, so I don't feel confident reviewing changes in that area.
(I am not stalking you – I promise! – I just couldn't let that
opportunity pass by after pushing another set of apt resolver changes
triggered by your package
Niels Thykier wrote...
> Have you tried "linux-any", which would match "any" as the default
> wildcard for any architecture specific binary package (vs. "all", which
> really means "architecture independent")?
Yes, that works - but it creates some 19 packages that are bitwise
identical. Perhaps I
>
>
> Hi!
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> There's one problem left: the .symbols file for libgrokj2k1 declares a
> dependency on libgrokj2k (rather than 2k1). Please bump it a year ahead :)
>
Thanks! that was the last lintian warning :) All green now.
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:24:18PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> Thanks a lot for testing this I've fixed the build error - please try it
> again when you have time.
Hi!
Sorry for the delay.
There's one problem left: the .symbols file for libgrokj2k1 declares a
dependency on libgrokj2k (
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zhcon"
* Package name : zhcon
Version : 1:0.2.6-17
Upstream Author : ejoy
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/zhcon/
* License : GPL-2.0+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/chinese-team/zh
Hi,
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 17:34 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> The obivous way to declare architecture-all-but-linux-only binary
> packages was
>
> > Architecture: linux-all
>
> but there is no such architecture wildcard. That package isn't build, also
> lintian emits an according warning.
>
>
Christoph Biedl:
> Hello,
>
> while packaging something that makes sense on Linux only, but one of the
> built packages is architecture-*in*dependent while depending on some
> of the linux-any ones - in other words, that arch-indep package makes
> no sense on non-linux ...
>
> The obivous way to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit"
* Package name: runit
Version : 2.1.2-37
Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape
* URL : http://smarden.org/runit/
* License : BSD-3-clause
* Vcs
Hello,
while packaging something that makes sense on Linux only, but one of the
built packages is architecture-*in*dependent while depending on some
of the linux-any ones - in other words, that arch-indep package makes
no sense on non-linux ...
The obivous way to declare architecture-all-but-linu
15 matches
Mail list logo
