[Help] pvm: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, while I do not intend to maintain pvm personally some Debian Med package depend from it. Thus I like to see bug #957717 fixed but I need help. I commited some general packaging changes so you can find the last packaging state in Git[1]. When building this I get the following output: cc -DSY

Bug#968153: RFS: tinymux/2.12.0.10-1 -- text-based multi-user virtual world server

2020-08-11 Thread Stephen Dennis
Current status: It builds and rebuilds for me on two different clean Debian environments. I have never gotten the '/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lmux' error. Adam hasn't responded in two days and is probably waiting for me to fix an error I cannot reproduce. Can anyone else build it? Am I building thi

Bug#968238: RFS: radsecproxy/1.8.2-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec

2020-08-11 Thread Sven Hartge
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsecproxy": * Package name: radsecproxy Version : 1.8.2-1 Upstream Author : Fabian Mauchle * URL : https://radsecproxy.github.io/ * License : BSD-3-

Bug#964778: closing 964778

2020-08-11 Thread Sven Hartge
close 964778 thanks Newer version will be uploaded to backport later.

Bug#965018: marked as done (RFS: freetype-py/2.2.0-1 -- Freetype Python bindings for Python 3)

2020-08-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:35:27 +0200 with message-id and subject line RFS: freetype-py/2.2.0-1 -- done has caused the Debian Bug report #965018, regarding RFS: freetype-py/2.2.0-1 -- Freetype Python bindings for Python 3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#965018: RFS: freetype-py/2.2.0-1 -- Freetype Python bindings for Python 3

2020-08-11 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-08-11 20:07, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2020-08-11 19:48, Bastian Germann wrote: Am 11.08.20 um 12:38 schrieb Drew Parsons:> The diff reports that the [egg_info] section got removed from setup.cfg. ... The uploaded orig file also changed, so be sure to have the current one. That will ma

Bug#965018: RFS: freetype-py/2.2.0-1 -- Freetype Python bindings for Python 3

2020-08-11 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-08-11 19:48, Bastian Germann wrote: Am 11.08.20 um 12:38 schrieb Drew Parsons:> The diff reports that the [egg_info] section got removed from setup.cfg. ... The uploaded orig file also changed, so be sure to have the current one. That will make a difference, thanks for clarifying. D

Bug#965018: RFS: freetype-py/2.2.0-1 -- Freetype Python bindings for Python 3

2020-08-11 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 11.08.20 um 12:38 schrieb Drew Parsons:> The diff reports that the [egg_info] section got removed from setup.cfg. > I changed the upstream to github instead of the built pypi.debian.net at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/freetype-py/-/commit/c3677c793fba92d142feef336ca063231819996

Bug#965018: RFS: freetype-py/2.2.0-1 -- Freetype Python bindings for Python 3

2020-08-11 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2020-07-29 17:09, Bastian Germann wrote: Am 29.07.20 um 06:10 schrieb Drew Parsons: The python3-setuptools-scm build dependency could not be installed in your environment which causes setuptools to try download this package. That obviously fails. Shouldn't pdebuild make sure that all the bui