On 2020-10-01 Hugh McMaster wrote:
[...]
> I've uploaded a new version of libexif-gtk to Debian Mentors, fixing
> the issues discussed in this thread.
> Thanks for your help with this.
Good morning Hugh,
I think this looks alright now.
I thought I should try it out and there is a only single
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 16:13 +0200, Leon Marz wrote:
> I have uploaded a new version of the package with asciidoc-base back
> included, but as a duplicate of asciidoc. I hope this is alright.
I don't think it is appropriate to duplicate the package like that.
I would instead suggest either
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:43:36PM +0200, François Mazen wrote:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> > # please do not reopen new bugs if the old one was not sponsored.
> > # -- otherwise context is lost.
>
> Sorry for the mess, I thought that I had to open a new sponsorship
> request
Thank you for the quick response.
I have uploaded a new version of the package with asciidoc-base back
included, but as a duplicate of asciidoc. I hope this is alright.
- Leon
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "amavisd-milter":
* Package name: amavisd-milter
Version : 1.7.1-1
Upstream Author : Petr Rehor
* URL : https://github.com/prehor/amavisd-milter
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fzf":
* Package name: fzf
Version : 0.22.0-1
Upstream Author : Junegunn Choi
* URL : https://github.com/junegunn/fzf
* License : Expat
* Vcs
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 12:48 PM Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On 2020-10-02 14:40, Leon Marz wrote:
> >* Remove vim-asciidoc (Closes: #954780)
> >* Remove asciidoc-base as it is unnecessary
> >* Put files from asciidoc-base to asciidoc
> >* Remove asciidoc-doc as there are no real docs
>
Hi Leon,
On 2020-10-02 14:40, Leon Marz wrote:
>* Remove vim-asciidoc (Closes: #954780)
>* Remove asciidoc-base as it is unnecessary
>* Put files from asciidoc-base to asciidoc
>* Remove asciidoc-doc as there are no real docs
So it seems that three binary packages are being
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asciidoc":
* Package name: asciidoc
Version : 9.0.2-1
Upstream Author : AsciiDoc Contributors
https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc
* URL :
9 matches
Mail list logo