Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pngcheck":
* Package name: pngcheck
Version : 2.3.0-13
Upstream Author : Greg Roelofs ,
* URL : http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/apps/pngcheck.html
* License
Hello Bart,
I have uploaded a new version of my package. It contains the
corrections to the copyright file. Can you check and approve it?
Regards,
Vincent
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sane-backends":
Package name: sane-backends
Version : 1.0.31-4
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
URL : http://www.sane-project.org
L
Hi Paul,
Version opentype-sanitizer_8.1.1+dfsg.1-1 uploaded to mentors.
2020-12-04 04:26 CET, Paul Wise:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:09 PM Romain Porte wrote:
>
> > Uploaded a new version +dfsg.1-1 on mentors with your explanation in
> > debian/copyright as suggested by Lintian.
> The URLs pointed
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "braillefont":
* Package name: braillefont
Version : 1.0-3
Upstream Author : Adam Borowski
* URL : https://github.com/kilobyte/braillefont
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shotwell":
Package name: shotwell
Version : 0.30.11-1
Upstream Author : Jim Nelson
URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Shotwell
License : LGPL-2.1
Hello,
About packaging QAbc I have an interrogation:
I use debhelper but I don't use specific features
of debhelper 13.
Anyway, should I set debhelper = 13 as build dependency
or can I set debhelper >= 12 to be more flexible
for transition from sid to testing and to stable ?
Thanks for your repl
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:39:26PM +0100, Benoît Rouits wrote:
> I use debhelper but I don't use specific features
> of debhelper 13.
> Anyway, should I set debhelper = 13 as build dependency
Yes.
> or can I set debhelper >= 12 to be more flexible
> for transition from sid to testing and to stable
Thank you for your reply.
I used to put this line:
Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12), ...
Should I then remove "-compat" like this ?
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 13), ...
Le 04/12/2020 à 21:29, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:39:26PM +0100, Benoît Rouits wrote:
I u
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:08:29PM +0100, Benoît Rouits wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I used to put this line:
> Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12), ...
>
> Should I then remove "-compat" like this ?
> Build-Depends: debhelper (= 13), ...
No. Build-Depends: debhelper is a normal buil
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "ucommon".
It was removed from testing and keeps other packages from migrating to
testing.
* Package name: ucommon
Version : 7.0.0-16.1
* URL : http://www.gn
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 16:16 +0100, Romain Porte wrote:
> Version opentype-sanitizer_8.1.1+dfsg.1-1 uploaded to mentors.
Uploaded to NEW.
For future uploads please file an RFS again and I will get to it when I
am able to do so.
> Done, two warnings remain with `lintian -EviIL +pedantic`:
lintia
Dear mentors,
Thanks to the comments from some of you on bug Bug#976120 (RFS:
qabc/2.0-1 [ITP]), I finalized at last a neat packaging (i think) of
QAbc: minimal GUI for ABC music notation.
I am now looking for a mentor and I would be grateful, if some of you
are interested, to let qabc be in
13 matches
Mail list logo
