On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:56:26PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > But I was told to "using rm_conffile directive from .maintscript file"
> > This is wrong. rm_conffile is only for cases when a conffile is no longer
> > shipped. This is explained in dpkg-maintscript-helper(1). But
> >
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:06 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:57:37PM -0500, wrote:
> > > > > > How to do that please?
> > > > > The correct way, it seems, would be to follow the suggestion in the
> > > > > original bug report and fix the "rm -f /etc/dnsmasq.d/dbab.*"
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:07 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:03:10PM -0500, wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:53 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:40:06PM -0500, wrote:
> > > > > > Why
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:03:10PM -0500, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:53 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:40:06PM -0500, wrote:
> > > > > Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a
> > > > > warning?
> > > >
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:57:37PM -0500, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > > > > How to do that please?
> > > > The correct way, it seems, would be to follow the suggestion in the
> > > > original bug report and fix the "rm -f /etc/dnsmasq.d/dbab.*" line in
> > > > the 1.3.3-1 postrm.
> > >
> >
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:53 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:40:06PM -0500, wrote:
> > > > Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a
> > > > warning?
> > > Have you read its description?
> >
> > Please don't overestimate my ability to decrypt
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:41 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:19:44AM -0500, wrote:
> > > > How to do that please?
> > > The correct way, it seems, would be to follow the suggestion in the
> > > original bug report and fix the "rm -f /etc/dnsmasq.d/dbab.*" line in
> > >
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:40:06PM -0500, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > > Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a
> > > warning?
> > Have you read its description?
>
> Please don't overestimate my ability to decrypt the description.
> If I understand what it is
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 11:49:32AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a warning?
> Have you read its description?
Please don't overestimate my ability to decrypt the
On 2021-12-07, at 11:49:32 -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a
> warning?
>
> Aren't we supposed to use dpkg-maintscript-helper in maintainer
> scripts? At least I was told to do so.
>
> I tried to add `dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile`
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 11:49:32AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a warning?
Have you read its description?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a warning?
Aren't we supposed to use dpkg-maintscript-helper in maintainer
scripts? At least I was told to do so.
I tried to add `dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile` in my .postrm
file for my dbab package, and now I'm
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:19:44AM -0500, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > > > You should remove them manually in postrm, but only on
> > > > purge.
> > >
> > But now you will need to also recover from a bad state
> > left by upgrades to 1.5.7-1.
>
> Ah... it is getting more and more
13 matches
Mail list logo
