Control: owner -1 !
Hi Joshua,
Joshua Peisach writes:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kotlin-mode":
>
> * Package name: kotlin-mode
>Version : 20210917git0-1
>Upstream Author : Emacs Kotli
Hi Ben!
On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 20:51 -0500, Ben Westover wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "makemkv-oss" and
> "makemkv-bin" (they depend on each other):
It's great that you're working on the packaging
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "makemkv-oss" and
"makemkv-bin" (they depend on each other):
* Package name: makemkv-oss
Version : 1.16.5-1
* URL : https://makemkv.com/
* License :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kotlin-mode":
* Package name: kotlin-mode
Version : 20210917git0-1
Upstream Author : Emacs Kotlin Mode Maintainers
* URL :
https://github.com/Emacs-Kotlin-Mo
Hi,
I forgot: If I understand the [Policy] correctly, this should be a
DELAYED/0, right?
[Policy]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu
On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 23:43 +0100, Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> De
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qtractor":
* Package name : qtractor
Version : 0.9.25-1
Upstream Author : Rui Nuno Capela
* URL : https://qtractor.sourceforge.io/
* License : GPL-2+,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sofia-sip":
* Package name: sofia-sip
Version : 1.12.11+20110422.1-2.2
Upstream Author : Pekka Pessi, Martti Mela, Kai Vehmanen
* URL : http://sofia-sip.sour
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2022 23:20:12 +0100
with message-id <20220116232012.2c6c3...@heffalump.sk2.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1003843: RFS: scummvm/2.5.1-0.1 [NMU] -- engine for
several graphical adventure games
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003843,
regarding RFS: scummvm/2.5.1-0.1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-control-center":
* Package name: budgie-control-center
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Budgie Desktop Developers
* URL : https://github.com/buddieso
On 2022-01-16 12:56 -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 4:42 PM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> I have a question regarding marking
> golang-github-danverbraganza-varcaser-dev Multi-Arch: foreign
> what's the purpose of it?
>
> I did find an explanation from https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/HOW
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 12:56:38PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> I guess I don't understand the concept and implication of Debian's
> cross built, as I see that easygen is being cross built without
> 'Multi-Arch: foreign', yet golang-github-danverbraganza-varcaser-dev
> is not, despite having the 'Multi
Hi Tong,
On 1/16/22 10:41 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
I'll remove the build dependency of easygen as planned, as I know for
sure it can fix the issue
I am not sure if that's the problem here. Why would it fix the issue?
[...]
config.go:1:1: expected 'package', found 'EOF'
which is in turn caused by
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 12:56 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 4:42 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 4:09 PM Debian Bug Tracking System
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:07:44 +
> > > with message-id
> > > and subject line Bug#98099
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 4:42 PM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 4:09 PM Debian Bug Tracking System
> wrote:
> >
> > Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:07:44 +
> > with message-id
> > and subject line Bug#980990: fixed in golang-github-danverbraganza-varcaser
> > 0.0~git201902
On 2022-01-16 Thomas Dickey wrote:
[...]
> I reviewed the test-data differences, didn't see a problem, and verified
> with cproto (which uses lex/yacc) that there are no differences.
> So I updated the debian files to combine the two (just packaging one
> "byacc" with backtracking).
Great.
[...
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 05:34:42PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2022-01-16 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:03:14AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > I would like to question the introduction of another binary package:
> > > * "byacc2" seems to be a (newly in
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 3:21 AM Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> Hi Tong,
>
> On 1/15/22 2:55 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The situation should have been fixed with the new upload of easygen.
> >>
> >> However, the CI build is still failing in salsa. This is something
> >> that I don't understand
On 2022-01-16 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:03:14AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > I would like to question the introduction of another binary package:
> > * "byacc2" seems to be a (newly introduced) Debiansm. Googling for
> > "byacc2" only finds links related to t
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:07:42AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 07:58:07AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:03:14AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> ...
> > > * Is the double compilation/binary necessary? - Is /usr/bin/byacc2
> >
> > I thought it w
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 02:39:04PM +0100, ابو الغيث عليّ wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> What is the difference between Yacc and Lex GNU tools.
> And Byacc or Bison?!
bison has a lot of non-yacc extensions.
I don't believe any third-party has made a list of differences.
Consider this like the differe
Hello Thomas,
What is the difference between Yacc and Lex GNU tools.
And Byacc or Bison?!
Berkeley still a source of truthful tools and clean mainstream.
Do it keep byacc and blex.
Kind regards,
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 14:09 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 07:58:07AM -050
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 07:58:07AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:03:14AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
...
> > * Is the double compilation/binary necessary? - Is /usr/bin/byacc2
>
> I thought it would be the safest approach. I've made some effort to keep
> the two compa
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 08:03:14AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2022-01-15 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> [...]
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "byacc":
>
> > * Package name: byacc
> >Version : 1:2.0.20220114-1
> >Upstream Author : (Thomas E. Dickey)
> > * URL
23 matches
Mail list logo
