Re: CRLF in upstream source code

2022-03-14 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 08:51:27PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:25:53PM -0300, Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior wrote: > > I have a doubt. In cases where the upstream uses the MS-DOS pattern CRLF > > ("\r\n") to end of line, instead Unix pattern LF ("\n"). > > In this

Re: CRLF in upstream source code

2022-03-14 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:25:53PM -0300, Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior wrote: > I have a doubt. In cases where the upstream uses the MS-DOS pattern CRLF > ("\r\n") to end of line, instead Unix pattern LF ("\n"). > In this situation, should the maintainer make a patch converting this files > to

CRLF in upstream source code

2022-03-14 Thread Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior
Hi everyone, I have a doubt. In cases where the upstream uses the MS-DOS pattern CRLF ("\r\n") to end of line, instead Unix pattern LF ("\n"). In this situation, should the maintainer make a patch converting this files to the Unix pattern LF? Or to Debian is 'acceptable' to build a package from

Re: Process for consolidated source package

2022-03-14 Thread Eberhard Beilharz
David A. Redick wrote on 11.03.22 20:51: [...] A single repo/source base can be used to generate multiple debian packages. A number of games come to mind where we split the application and the data files into their respective packages. Some key questions might be are these packages