Control: tags -1 moreinfo
The rush package has a new upload:
rush (2.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1001091)
* Fix rush FTCBFS (Closes: #929160)
* Update Standards-Version to 4.6.1
* Drop debian/patches/intprops.patch(applied upstream)
* Drop
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:10:40 +0200
with message-id <07ba0a1e-4fe6-0e7e-d969-2cf8cde37...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1010399: RFS: davegnukem/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Retro-style
2D scrolling platform shooter
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010399,
regarding RFS:
Hi Andrey,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 05:51:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and
> > consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and
> consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with this?
>
> From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field to list
Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 14:31, Daniel Gröber a écrit :
> Hi Mentors,
>
> my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and
> consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with this?
>
> From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field
Hi Mentors,
my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and
consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with this?
From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field to list
all arches except mips64el. Is that the right thing to do
Am 17.06.22 um 10:30 schrieb Bo YU:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:42:38AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:
* drop debian/patches/intprops.patch
* drop debian/patches/format_security.diff
Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:42:38AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:
* drop debian/patches/intprops.patch
* drop debian/patches/format_security.diff
Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes when you have
not addressed his
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:29:52 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: qabc/1.9.1-1 -- minimal GUI for ABC music notation
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013081,
regarding RFS: qabc/1.9.1-1 -- minimal GUI for ABC music notation
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:12:18 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
There is: Please include the d/copyright info that is introduced with the new
version.
Please untag moreinfo when you are done with this.
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:15:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: vcdimager/2.0.1+dfsg-6 [ITA] -- VideoCD (VCD) image
mastering and ripping tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013084,
regarding RFS: vcdimager/2.0.1+dfsg-6 [ITA] -- VideoCD (VCD) image mastering
and
Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:
* drop debian/patches/intprops.patch
* drop debian/patches/format_security.diff
Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes when you have
not addressed his previous comments.
You have not included an explanation about the
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 07:18:23PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:37:48 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
What happened to format_security.diff?
Why did you remove it? It should still be valid but maybe needs a rebase.
Ok. I got huzz hint when applying the patch and i forget to
13 matches
Mail list logo
