Bug#1017875: RFS: blender-doc/3.2-1 [ITP] -- Blender Manual by the Blender Foundation

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 01:47:03AM +0300, Jonathan Rubenstein wrote: > * Package name: blender-doc >Version : 3.2-1 > blender-doc (3.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Initial release. (Closes: #1006255) Hi! The package looks pretty good, save for copyright stuff. Alas,

Bug#1012196: buglist

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 20:48:47 + =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Flechs?= wrote: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > Hm... You did not answer where you have got the original from. > This file seems to be very different from d3.js in https://github.com/d3/d3/releases/download/v3.4

Bug#1012196: buglist

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > Hm... You did not answer where you have got the original from. > This file seems to be very different from d3.js in https://github.com/d3/d3/releases/download/v3.4.9/d3.zip I was quite sure to use exactly the file from this source. May be it was broken after the aut

Re: parse SPDX-License-Identifier to produce copyright file

Hi, > Does there exist a tool for Debian that will parse a package directory (its > source files), extract the "SPDX-License-Identifier:" and produce something > that would fit into a machine-readable debian/copyright file? AFAIK, the reuse tool (which also generates these annoying headers) can

parse SPDX-License-Identifier to produce copyright file

Hi all, Does there exist a tool for Debian that will parse a package directory (its source files), extract the "SPDX-License-Identifier:" and produce something that would fit into a machine-readable debian/copyright file? Thanks Fab

Re: gcc vs clang

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 05:28:33PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > [cc me please] > > Hi there, > > I have a package stuck in sid because gcc-11 and above fails to > compile what seems to be legit c++-11 code. What's the package? > Is it ok to switch to clang instead for the time being (with

Re: gcc vs clang

AFAK GCC is the defacto standard in Debian. You may want to patch your project to be GCC-compatible.

gcc vs clang

[cc me please] Hi there, I have a package stuck in sid because gcc-11 and above fails to compile what seems to be legit c++-11 code. Is it ok to switch to clang instead for the time being (with proper documentation in d/rules) ?